Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Indian heat waves

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

List of Indian heat waves

List of Indian heat waves (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Duplicates List of heat waves. Jax 0677 (talk) 17:25, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:08, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:08, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep This is clearly a subset of the global list. As heatwaves are becoming more common and India is especially hot, it may be reasonable to split them off. In any case, that issue is not a reason to be deleting anything -- see
  WP:REDUNDANTFORK. Andrew D. (talk) 18:44, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep as creator. The global list is organised according to date, and is not in tabular form, so the heatwaves specific to India are not easily found. Further, this list includes several years for which there is no Wikipedia article and are not on the global list so it certainly does not duplicate the information there. SpinningSpark 19:03, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep It is easier to find the information per nation with separate list for nations instead of searching over the long list in the other article. Perhaps if that list was in columns where you could click and sort by nation, then this one would have no purpose. Dream Focus 19:16, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Keep a well source
  WP:RS useful article. Lightburst (talk) 22:25, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep an encyclopedic article. Useful for Wikipedia. --
  talk) 03:27, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep per

"Lists that are too general or too broad in scope have little value, unless they are split into sections. For example, a list of brand names would be far too long to be of value. If you have an interest in listing brand names, try to limit the scope in some way (by product category, by country, by date, etc.). This is best done by sectioning the general page under categories."

from

- talk 17:59, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.