Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Israeli companies quoted on the ASX

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Renaming may be proposed as

talk • mail) 03:15, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

List of Israeli companies quoted on the ASX

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't see how two Israeli companies being on the Australian exchange meets WP inclusion standards. Does not appear noteworthy, and further I don't see any sources or text which explains why the fact is notable. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 02:52, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I see where you are coming from; but this list is analogous to the accepted and established page on Israeli companies listing on the NASDAQ. There aren't two companies, rather 14 (the table isn't completed yet) and there will be around 20 within a few months. Israel is a significant player in the start-up world and the increasing visibility of Israeli companies on the ASX is of significance as they use it as a base for Asian expansion. If you look at https://www.google.com.au/search?q=israeli+companies+listing+on+asx&rlz=1C5CHFA_enAU729AU730&oq=israeli+companies+listing+on+asx&aqs=chrome..69i57j0l5.9183j0j9&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

you will see that this is considered of some significance in the Australian and Israeli media. There aren't references pointing to notability as the article is still under construction... Markbenjamin (talk) 03:21, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the

talk • contribs) 04:23, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

The articles referenced refer numerous times to the "fourteen" Israeli listed companies; this appears to be the only list of them all on the internet. I think people reading about the increasing rate and number of listings should have a reference on the internet where they can look them all up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Markbenjamin (talk • contribs) 08:52, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

keep/rename? The list itself seems to be of secondary importance; the phenomenon of Israeli firms choosing ASX listings seems notable. A new name and a rewrite seem to be in order, however. Mangoe (talk) 14:16, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 03:35, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Phenomenon is notable. Globes is a respected financial paper and would not write about it unless it was significant.--Geewhiz (talk) 06:06, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep. Possibly rename. This has been quite a phenomenon for the past 2-3 years, and has been covered in RS.Icewhiz (talk) 06:33, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.