Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Jewish American political figures (2nd nomination)
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep - due to conditions presented - see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Jewish Americans (2nd nomination) StabRule 07:43, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
List of Jewish American political figures
List of Jewish Americans -- having them as separate lists is utterly farfetched StabRule 08:15, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply
]
Solution: Mass delete all these lists, as they are virtual "copy and pastes" from the main article. StabRule 08:31, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- List of Jewish Americans than these smaller lists - which is fine - if a vote is put on the large list I will get ride of the afds on these. StabRule 10:28, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep this is a clear bad WP:FAITH nomination, this user is almost certainly a sock puppet and their sole edits Special:Contributions/StabRule and that of one of their ips Special:Contributions/72.144.161.73 have been devoted solely to placing afds on Jewish lists and spamming users, who they seem to choose on the basis of their acquaintance through another account. Arniep 15:41, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and edit for relevance. Deal with nominator per ]
- First of all, the WP:POINT nomination here - this could even be considered speedy delete material. StabRule 21:16, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Why are you only concentrating on Jewish lists: Special:Contributions/StabRule, Special:Contributions/72.144.161.73? Arniep 22:09, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong keep - the overall list is unwieldy; we should do what was done with the ]
- Keep — wikipedia is not paper: I see no problem with subdividing sufficiently long lists. — RJH 01:44, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep. Same for all religion lists per openly stated policy and Martin Niemöller. How about we mass delete stupidity and bigotry.-- JJay 01:53, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.