Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Jewish American writers (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep - due to conditions presented - see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Jewish Americans (2nd nomination) StabRule 07:40, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

List of Jewish American writers

Solution: Mass delete all these lists, as they are virtual "copy and pastes" from the main article. StabRule 08:30, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

List of Jewish Americans than these smaller lists - which is fine - if a vote is put on the large list I will get ride of the afds on these. StabRule 10:28, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply

]

• Speedy Keep this is a clear bad
  WP:FAITH nomination, this user is almost certainly a sock puppet and their sole edits Special:Contributions/StabRule and that of one of their ips Special:Contributions/72.144.161.73 have been devoted solely to placing afds on Jewish lists and spamming users, who they seem to choose on the basis of their acquaintance through another account. Arniep 15:42, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep and edit for relevance. Deal with nominator per
  WP:Point. Durova 16:54, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• First of all, the
  WP:POINT nomination here - this could even be considered speedy delete material. StabRule 21:15, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Again, this user is unnaturally obsessed with deleting Jewish lists. This is getting incredibly boring, there is no lack of space on Wikipedia, all ethnicities should be allowed their own lists. Please see StabRule's contributions for evidence of his crazy obsession Special:Contributions/StabRule, Special:Contributions/72.144.161.73. Arniep 22:20, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong keep - the overall list is unwieldy; we should do what was done with the
  List of Jews and make it into a catalogue of lists. - Taxwoman 23:14, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep — wikipedia is not paper: I see no problem with subdividing sufficiently long lists. — RJH 01:43, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Keep. Same for all religion lists per openly stated policy and Martin Niemöller. How about we mass delete stupidity and bigotry.-- JJay 01:56, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.