Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of LSU Tigers football College Football Playoff rankings and Poll history

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 05:34, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

List of LSU Tigers football College Football Playoff rankings and Poll history

List of LSU Tigers football College Football Playoff rankings and Poll history (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lightly-linked, non-standard subtopic article within the

WP:CFB project. Core ranking content is duplicated at List of LSU Tigers football seasons. Nearly identical discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Arizona Wildcats football College Football Playoff rankings and Poll history was resolved as delete (including specifically re List of Arizona Wildcats football seasons overlap). UW Dawgs (talk) 02:40, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 03:59, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 03:59, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:00, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Content duplicated elsewhere. Historical team rankings should be included within either the team article or at a list of team seasons. Essentially fancruft of something that actually exists. Hog Farm (talk) 05:42, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom Ryan shell (talk) 21:19, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • comment there's room for discussion here about the usability of this article: the content itself is notable and worthy for inclusion in the LSU Tigers football article, but it's also a large block which makes it a candidate for breaking out this information into a different sub-article. The question is: at what point do we break out data into a separate list to supplement an article? This looks like a candidate for such a discussion. I think it's reasonable that the information itself be kept. Should it be kept in the main article; the answer is delete: should it be kept in a separate article; the answer is keep.--Paul McDonald (talk) 14:33, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.