Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of NASCAR drivers who have won in each of top three series

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 00:10, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of NASCAR drivers who have won in each of top three series

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG. The sourcing in the article is inadequate, citing the homepage of NASCAR.com, as well of Racing-reference.info, another Primary source which is owned by NASCAR. A

WP:CRUFT. -"Ghost of Dan Gurney" 18:37, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Motorsport-related deletion discussions. -"Ghost of Dan Gurney" 18:37, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -"Ghost of Dan Gurney" 18:37, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:14, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:14, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep While the nomination makes sense in that this isn't covered very heavily, I did find one other source here [1]. 36 drivers have accomplished this, which inherently makes it noteworthy. Just my two cents. Spf121188 (talk) 15:43, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete - Per nominator, this currently lacks sufficient sourcing. If proper sourcing can be found I would prefer for this article to be kept, but as it stands it isn't up to scratch. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 06:11, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per the reasons given by the nominator MWright96 (talk) 15:24, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Poorly sourced and
trivial list Frank Anchor 00:42, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete per nominators, lacks sourcing Nascar9919 (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.