Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Parkruns in Australia

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Salvio giuliano 17:42, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of Parkruns in Australia

List of Parkruns in Australia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails NLIST, there are not IS RS sources showing this has been discussed as a group. Article references ONE primary source 900+times. Wikipedia is not a mirror directory of parkrun events.  // Timothy :: talk  17:37, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Nominating this article for insufficient sources six hours after its first creation, with about 70% of the individual entries incomplete, is inappropriate.
    WP:BEFORE C1 reads "If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for AfD". An assertion that article cannot be fixed with normal editing is far fetched. -- Finlay McWalter··–·Talk 19:51, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply
    ]
What encyclopaedic merit does this topic have and how does it not fall under
WP:NOTDIR? The USA, UK and France ones have their issues too so their existence does not automatically mean that the Australia one must be kept. There is no consensus (yet) that a list of Parkruns for a country is notable by default. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 21:46, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.