Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Snapple Real Facts

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

List of Snapple Real Facts

List of Snapple Real Facts (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Creator removed PROD. Does Wikipedia really need this list of factoids? it's mentioned in the article on Snapple, and the company maintain a list on their website. Surely enough. TheLongTone (talk) 21:01, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• wikipedia does need this article due to the explination of the phenomina and other information not mentiond on the snapple article — Preceding unsigned comment added by Meehand (talk • contribs) 21:12, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per
  WP:INDISCRIMINATE. This is an unsourced list of trivia that is printed inside of Snapple bottle caps. Gobōnobō ^{+ c} 21:55, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete, sufficiently covered in the main article. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 21:59, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Ugh. Talk about indiscriminate trivia. Several of them are rather infamous urban legends. Makes me wonder how many of them are sourced directly from urban legends. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:09, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:13, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:13, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Indiscriminate trivia, and almost certainly a copyright violation. Pburka (talk) 22:20, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete
  WP:NOR Secret ^account 05:51, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete per
  WP:INDISCRIMINATE and probably a copyright violation. Invertzoo (talk) 16:15, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.