Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of United States Presidents by middle name

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Cbrown1023 01:29, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of United States Presidents by middle name

Delete as hopeless trivia. Tagged earlier for importance but it's so clearly unimportant why wait? Otto4711 22:49, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep (as for first name) why not? There are also list by middle name, surname, nickname and much more. Why not this? I think that can be useful to somebody, and American Presidents are an important subject, so I think that a list like this deserve his place in wikipedia. At least, it can be merged with the other lists, if you think it doesn't deserve a whole article. But I think that I would create caos. by Snowolf (talk) on 22:54, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

American Presidents are important subjects, but that doesn't mean that every single aspect of everything related to American Presidents is notable. Otto4711 23:04, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Excellent example of indiscriminate, trivial, and
what Wikipedia is not. Agent 86 01:47, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. However, it is not a collection of trivia. Picaroon 02:58, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the
SkierRMH 05:26, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete. There's no point in this list at all. Any basic presidents list on Wikipedia has this information already. 23skidoo 06:18, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, trivia.--Vsion 07:15, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notableForrestLane42 03:03, 19 January 2007 (UTC)ForrestLane42[reply]

Are you sure that's the reason you think this should be deleted, and/or that you clicked the right afd? Presidents certainly are notable; they just don't need these lists about them. No amount of notability can affect that. Picaroon 03:11, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Picaroon, right of course presidents notable lists on their middle name, not so notableForrestLane42 04:15, 19 January 2007 (UTC)ForrestLane42[reply]

Delete as
indiscriminate. Ohconfucius 10:20, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Merged with
List of United States Presidential nicknames. The nickname section was not effected, but I did some minor changes to the other names lists, stuff that went beyond trivia. I didn't redirect this article to the nickname page yet, because I wanted to find out what others thought of this first. Jjmillerhistorian 17:27, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete, trivia mikm_t 23:58, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete, I can think of how a list by last name might be useful and encyclopedic, but not for first name and definitely not for middle name.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.