Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Victoria's Secret models

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 06:01, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

List of Victoria's Secret models

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Effectively unsourced list that does not provide any additional information other than nationality (which is also unsourced, frequently debated, and not generally relevant for models).

talk) 05:49, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the

talk to me 13:54, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the

talk to me 13:54, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Keep - There are problems with the list that the nom brings up, but none that merit deletion as far as I can tell. It needs sources, but even a brief gsearch returns a lot, suggesting it easily passes GNG. Nationality might not be necessary and other information would be good, but neither are cause to
WP:BLOWITUP. --— Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 15:41, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

~~Keep - no need for flags and sources are available.~~ ~~Zambelo; talk 06:46, 19 October 2014 (UTC)~~[reply]

Zambelo is a sockpuppet of an indefinitely blocked editor. 80.168.165.101 (talk) 12:59, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. While agreeing with nominator about problems, I agree with Rhododendrites that they're fixable and not in any way grounds for deletion. Not sure if sources are needed for each entry here, since each name is wikilinked to another article which (presumably) does have sources. Further, nationality is, for some persons, a noteworthy piece of data for each model -- tells something about their story; further, it is possible that the list (essentially a database) could be expanded with other information in future, such as height, age, other information. Last, while an unofficial measure of course, consider that this article is heavily read averaging over 1000 pageviews per day, meaning that readers read this page.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 10:08, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep perfectly reasonable list of notable people. References would be nice but no reason to delete this. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:08, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.