Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Wikipedias (2nd nomination)
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was SPEEDY KEEP, no deletion rationale offered,
WP:JUSTAVOTE. This is inexplicable as a good faith nomination, and inexcusable from an experienced editor. postdlf (talk) 18:23, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply
]
AfDs for this article:
- List of Wikipedias (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- 'Delete or create a soft redir to List of Wikipedias at Meta. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 09:07, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep per WP:SK, "The nominator ... fails to advance an argument for deletion". Warden (talk) 09:34, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep – No valid reason for deletion has been presented, per WP:LISTPURP as a functional navigation aid for finding and browsing articles. Northamerica1000(talk) 09:40, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 09:46, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 09:47, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Many of the individual language Wikipedias are sufficiently notable to have articles in the English Wikipedia. It is entirely appropriate per ]
- Speedy keep No valid reason given and the topic is notable. Seasider91 (talk) 12:36, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Procedural Keep - No valid rationale for deletion given. Carrite (talk) 15:56, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and close Duh. Lugnuts (talk) 18:11, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.