Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of birds of Yuma, Arizona

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to List of birds of Yuma County, Arizona. czar ⨹ 16:12, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

List of birds of Yuma, Arizona

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable, - No other city or town has a bird list created for it. All information for the article can be found at List of birds of Yuma County, Arizona. There is a precedent for county lists, although I would say this too is not notable.....Pvmoutside (talk) 13:41, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:53, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:53, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:53, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Right now the city article says "Yuma area", and I'm not sure how that compares to "Yuma County". Are there sources specifically listing birds in Yuma (city) or the "Yuma area"? I'm mainly concerned about original research in the city article, particularly given the notes on the talk page. Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:41, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ymblanter (talk) 08:02, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of birds of Yuma County, Arizona. However, I wouldn't be opposed to listing that article for deletion for the same reasons. Tavix | Talk 04:23, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect While I understand the desire for having a list for the south-west corner (county) of the state, having both that and a list for its county seat would require an extraordinary rationale. – Philosopher ^{Let us reason together.} 01:50, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.