Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional characters who are physically scarred

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --

List of fictional characters who are physically scarred

I believe this to be of no encyclopedic merit. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional characters missing an appendage is of interest. —Encephalon 05:44, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Listcruft. I'd suggest it be converted into a category, but I think this is a bit too broad for that. EVula 06:32, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, especially considering the precedent the nom mentioned. A scar is significantly less notable than a missing limb.
  TC 06:35, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Categorize, it seems exactly the right size for a good category. Andrew Levine 16:39, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Were it to be categorised, unlike the nomination above for characters with one eye, it's difficult to quantify the importance of 'physical scarring' and identify whether one character or another should go in. DWaterson 22:35, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete listcruft M1ss1ontomars2k4 ^{(T | C | @)} 01:18, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete -- pretty much impossible to reach even a reasonable level of inclusiveness, never mind completeness. Unmaintainable. Haikupoet 04:27, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Listcruft. Sets a ridiculous precedent, we can't have lists of fictional characters of every conceivable type... We'd have to allow lists of characters with green eyes, with blue eyes, etc as well as every other possible way of classifying them. It's ridiculous, and a category would be ridiculous for the same reason. --The Way 05:54, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.