Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of number-one hits of 1961 (Mexico)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 17:23, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of number-one hits of 1961 (Mexico)

)

– (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The charts taken from a single radio station in Mexico City which per

WP:SINGLENETWORK is not allowed as it does not represent the whole country. Source: [1] Erick (talk) 03:38, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the

(talk) 03:52, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Keep The charts from 1961 to 1968 were provided by Audiomusica, which was not a radio station but a music magazine (apparently like Billboard itself) based on Mexico D.F (which is what probably was meant when the city was mentioned in that issue). (Source: [2]). Only for 1969, the charts for "Mexico" were indeed provided by a single radio station. Also, the "Hits of the World" section of the Billboard magazine from where these charts were taken would specify if they represented the whole country or a city in particular, as many "Buenos Aires" and "Rio de Janeiro" charts were sometimes featured, even alongside the charts for their respective countries ([3]). --CHUI372 (talk) 04:25, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As per

WP:CHARTS, you must provide a source that shows the methodology of the charts (how the charts are ranked by the magazine) and that they do not collect music charts from a single radio stations. Much like how MonitorLatino explains how they collect data for their charts on their website. You must have also have multiple sources that shows Audiomusica covering sales or broadcast outlets (Billboard itself is not enough). I actually brought up this chart in a discussion a few years ago. Erick (talk) 04:48, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:48, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:48, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep. Nominator has not raised a valid argument for deletion. WP:CHARTS and WP:SINGLENETWORK are content guidelines about the use of charts inside wikipedia articles. They are not Notability guidelines for the existence of articles about the charts themselves. duffbeerforme (talk) 10:50, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:00, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.