Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of places named Cheyenne

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination has been withdrawn. (

Lepricavark (talk) 14:59, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

List of places named Cheyenne

List of places named Cheyenne (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Any places named Cheyenne should go in Cheyenne (disambiguation). This isn't a proper set index, and it's packed with partial title matches. (This is also part of an ongoing disagreement between me and the list's creator regarding what should or shouldn't go in the dab page.) Clarityfiend (talk) 22:20, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Regarding Cheyenne (disambiguation) and this page - there were long discussions about the disambiguation pages in the past, including and culminating in this archived discussion. Including the List of places page, which was a compromise kind of page for someone that wanted to expand the use of the Cheyenne disambiguation page.–CaroleHenson (talk) 22:32, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It seems that this discussion might be open to interpretation. The "List of places named Cheyenne" page was a compromised to resolve a page entitled Cheyenne, Colorado that was a list of every place with the word Cheyenne (or Cheyenne Mountain as I remember) in Colorado. Although I created the page as part of the resolution of that page, I don't have an opinion one way or the other whether it stays or goes. Today's stats say that it gets about 3 hits a day. I hadn't realized there was no link from Cheyenne (disambiguation) (15 hits/day), if there had been, it might have gotten more but not likely much more.–CaroleHenson (talk) 00:41, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the
talk) 01:54, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply
]
Note: This debate has been included in the
talk) 01:54, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.