Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of red-haired characters cast as People of Color for film or television

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:26, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of red-haired characters cast as People of Color for film or television

List of red-haired characters cast as People of Color for film or television (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non-notable list which also fails

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people, Film, Television, and Lists. Giraffer ^{(talk·contribs)} 07:55, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Non-notable, search finds nothing to support this arbitrary list meeting GNG. Cowlibob (talk) 08:54, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per
  WP:NOTDIRECTORY. Textbook example of a non-encyclopedic cross-categorisation. BilletsMauves^€500 12:35, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete - trivial and non-encyclopaedic cross-categorisation Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:23, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• This would make a fascinating essay somewhere, perhaps the nucleus of a thesis, but yeah, it doesn't belong here unless someone finds where an RS has already made this connection. Jclemens (talk) 19:53, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete
  chatter) 20:55, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete: I doubt someone would need this list for anything, really. Asparagusus (interaction) 01:39, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - I agree with BilletsMauves, this is exactly the type of cross-categorization specifically mentioned in
  WP:GNG. - Aoidh (talk) 02:28, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete. This is just too indiscriminate as far as data goes. It also dances around a general topic - that of race related controversy with film casting without actually addressing the topic, but that's more of an aside. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 17:17, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Can someone just close this already? We all know what it was designed to do (and such a thing isn't helpful to the project), and it wholly lacks any sort of citations.
  Snowball it already. Why? I Ask (talk) 14:21, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete. Too specific of a list without reliable sources talking about this particular thing and per
  WP:POINT. (Mermaid mentioned above and some older reddit discussions I found). Skynxnex (talk) 15:12, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete - Nonsensical
  directory article. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 12:40, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.