Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of tallest buildings in Sejong (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:40, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of tallest buildings in Sejong

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per previous AFD, has no navigational purpose, no citations, likely fails notability as well. G4 declined Justi yaya 12:26, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture and South Korea. Justi yaya 12:26, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:26, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete G4 Declined??? How so? To me it howled, screamed G4! Every delete reason in 1st nomination still applies, so I'm not going to bother repeatin' 'em all here. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 13:03, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I believe the admin made a fair decision in declining G4 (I do not think the article is "substantially identical to the deleted version", though I'm not sure the changes address the deletion rationale). That being said, the list serves no real purpose. We cannot have a list of tallest buildings for every city - and Sejong City does not check any of the boxes which would make it especially notable (as opposed to NYC or Abu Dhabi). ‡ El cid, el campeador ^talk 13:09, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

el cid, el campeador's comment made me go back and look up the edit summary and I note the admin's rationale and I was just being dramatic and just, well, you know, *blush*, that sort of thing. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 13:31, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: An unreferenced list of redlinked items, created by the same editor as the instance deleted at AfD in November 2020. In the absence of references, this would appear to be
original research, and even if referenced, nothing indicates that it would form a notable group, whether of red or blue links. No reason to overturn the previous AfD consensus. (It appears to have been developed using List of tallest buildings in Daegu, which is also an unreferenced list of redlink entries.) AllyD (talk) 13:18, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete per the 5 bullet points in my nomination statement at the previous discussion Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:34, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.