Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Little Majer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete all. Keeper | 76 | what's in a name? 17:54, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Little Majer

The article on the artist was deleted (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lil Majer), but it and all the albums and singles have been recreated. (Lil Majer has been tagged for speedy deletion as recreation of deleted material, but the albums and songs are under consideration here.) Also included in this nomination:

Speedy Delete of Lil Majer (G4), Delete of others. Obviously Lil Majer needs to be speedied under G4. If the artist didn't survive the AFD, it is highly unlikely anything produced by the artist is notable enough for Wikipedia either. -- ShinmaWa^(talk) 03:35, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

None of the articles, including Little Majer, were part of the previous AfD, so G4 doesn't apply. BradV 03:36, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

But Lil Majer was, and was recreated. It is unclear if Lil Majer is part of this AFD or not. (I originally got 'Little' and 'Lil' confused -- not surprisingly. I fixed the above.) -- ShinmaWa^(talk) 03:40, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lil Majer, which is the article about the artist, was an easy G4, and is not part of the AfD. Since there is no speedy category for songs or albums, all the other articles had to go this route. BradV 03:44, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to reword your AFD then. The majority of your text is talking about the recreation of Lil Majer, rather than the articles you are actually putting up for AFD. You also imply strongly that all these articles were ALSO recreated after an AFD as well (you don't clarify that some of these were AFD and others weren't). Additionally, given the similiarity of "Little Majer" vs. "Lil Majer", we have a very confusing and ambiguous AFD here. Please fix your text. -- ShinmaWa^(talk) 03:50, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. The following claim appears in Little Majer: "It peaked at #25 in both the WeGotNext and VRA charts and hit #56 on the S.R.C. This also makes his first ground-breaking track since his 2004 street single "M.A.J.E.R." I do not recognize these charts, but if the charts are notable and the claims can be confirmed, then notability has been established. I note that the http://www.wegotnext.net/ site is displaying a "technical difficulties", so perhaps WeGotNext isn't notable. --Eastmain (talk) 03:52, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. All fail WP:Notability (music): no major label, no placement on any notable (or even verifiable) chart. Searches for VRA chart and VRA music chart on Google turn up nothing related to an actual music chart as far down as I cared to look (20 sites or so). --Closeapple (talk) 04:11, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:02, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:02, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all - no evidence of notability provided. Terraxos (talk) 00:56, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment:
prod}}. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 12:11, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete Only 6 Ghits for "Little Majer," two from Wikipedia, one from Myspace, and three from incidental combinations of Little and Majer. The artist himself only gets about 120. That's peanuts for a currently active musician. This is self-promotion. --Groggy Dice T | C 16:48, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.