Search results
Appearance
There is a page named "Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2010 February 16" on Wikipedia
- 01:44, 16 February 2010 (UTC) Delete Non notable selection. Is WP:OR It might make sense to WP:salt this page if you look at its' deletion log. NativeForeigner...6 KB (43,551 words) - 15:46, 3 March 2023
- once the first playmate of 2010 is announced per WP:CRYSTAL.--TRUCO 19:56, 16 February 2009 (UTC) I did write a reason, but for some reason it didn't show...33 KB (3,927 words) - 08:05, 26 March 2023
- GlassCobra 16:16, 16 February 2010 (UTC) Delete. Not enough strongly related articles to justify a navbox. --RL0919 (talk) 22:55, 21 February 2010 (UTC) The...8 KB (792 words) - 14:49, 21 May 2022
- 22:13, 16 February 2010 (UTC) Keep It's used, it's verifiable, it has sources. No reason for deletion. --Patrick (talk) 02:41, 17 February 2010 (UTC) Keep...7 KB (50,376 words) - 15:46, 3 March 2023
- 22:13, 5 February 2010 (UTC) Close with consensus to promote - rst20xx (talk) 16:42, 12 February 2010 (UTC) edit | discuss Delichon 4 articles Common House...444 bytes (1,221 words) - 03:17, 14 January 2021
- from 2010 | Archived delete discussions from 2011→ Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2010 December 31 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2010 December...21 KB (2,935 words) - 11:08, 5 February 2022
- was a demo album. -- Whpq (talk) 17:03, 16 February 2010 (UTC) Merge -as per User:Whpq. I can't remember for sur , but I think however that it will mean...6 KB (49,887 words) - 15:47, 3 March 2023
- 03:52, 6 March 2010 (UTC) AfDs for this article: Articles for deletion/Legislative district of Dasmariñas City Articles for deletion/Legislative district...8 KB (69,952 words) - 15:46, 3 March 2023
- page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was keep. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 16:02, 21 February 2010 (UTC) NAPMA...8 KB (66,015 words) - 15:47, 3 March 2023
- clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 20:44, 9 February 2010 (UTC) Suggest deletion - in 2.5 years this article has not been given citations...6 KB (39,695 words) - 15:45, 3 March 2023
- that. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡbomb 21:24, 16 February 2010 (UTC) Comment: I have notified the participants of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Titus about this AfD...7 KB (60,215 words) - 15:46, 3 March 2023
- nominator (non-admin closure) RadioFan (talk) 16:15, 21 February 2010 (UTC) AfDs for this article: Articles for deletion/I Thought I Lost You (song) I Thought...8 KB (59,746 words) - 15:46, 3 March 2023
- Fionnsci (talk • contribs) Comment: Articles can be nominated for deletion more than once. -- BigDom 08:48, 20 February 2010 (UTC) Keep played top-level football...7 KB (48,895 words) - 15:46, 3 March 2023
- the article as this was the fourth deletion (one prod and three A7's). —David Eppstein (talk) 00:23, 27 February 2010 (UTC) Stuart Jones (musician) (edit |...6 KB (48,039 words) - 15:46, 3 March 2023
- 16 February 2010 (UTC) AfDs for this article: Articles for deletion/Lindsay Ashford Articles for deletion/Lindsay Ashford (2nd nomination) Articles for...6 KB (48,254 words) - 15:45, 3 March 2023
- least seven days: please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion for more info. MuffledThud (talk) 16:41, 22 February 2010 (UTC) Delete. Closing admin will note...7 KB (55,576 words) - 15:46, 3 March 2023
- turned into an unsourced BLP, then deletion seems to be the best anwer. Drmies (talk) 16:06, 16 February 2010 (UTC) Just for those who haven't been involved...8 KB (63,609 words) - 15:46, 3 March 2023
- LibStar (talk) 23:47, 22 February 2010 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k...6 KB (41,777 words) - 15:46, 3 March 2023
- page) 15:00, 5 March 2013 (UTC) AfDs for this article: Articles for deletion/Southern Premier Soccer League 2010–11 SPSL season (edit | talk | history |...4 KB (372 words) - 15:19, 2 April 2022
- articles that are unfairly put up for deletion," argument.--RDBury (talk) 13:03, 16 February 2010 (UTC) Unreferenced is not a criterion for deletion,...5 KB (47,519 words) - 15:47, 3 March 2023
- to We have WS:PD for standard deletion discussions. billinghurst sDrewth 10:56, 9 February 2010 (UTC) I was only asking ;-) Thanks for the clarification
- page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was: Delete. - InvisibleSun 04:41, 16 February 2010 (UTC). This