Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 April 1

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
< 31 March 2 April >

Purge server cache

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 06:52, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indian Institute of Journalism & New Media

Indian Institute of Journalism & New Media (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Diploma Mill the diploma/degree/Certificate issued by the Institute are not recognized by

WP:ORG.Note it is a profit organisation. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:56, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:06, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:17, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Profit Organisation. No Notability twerk000 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 09:01, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:49, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Abigail Hopkins

Abigail Hopkins (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats
)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm nominating this article for AfD because the subject appears to fail our musician guidelines and entertainer guidelines. I have struggled to find articles that cover the subject in great detail outside the fact that she is Anthony Hopkins estranged daughter (and it's mainly gossip related sources). Perhaps you'll prove me wrong - and I welcome that - but, being the child of a notable figure does not make one inherently notable, and her career appears also non-notable. I suggest redirecting this article to Anthony Hopkins. Thank you everyone for your review and time! Missvain (talk) 22:33, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Missvain (talk) 22:33, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Missvain (talk) 22:33, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:10, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:10, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:11, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:11, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:11, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Her acting career is not at all on the level of notability. She has spent much of it in the shadow of her father and nothing suggests that she is notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:15, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Haven't found any significant coverage except for her mentions in the articles about her father. Fails
    WP:NACTOR. Less Unless (talk) 11:26, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Delete. With the exception of this review of her third studio album, none of her other music releases have been discussed in reliable sources. Her minor roles in short films and documentaries are not enough to warrant stand-alone inclusion.  Versace1608  Wanna Talk? 15:08, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, Not much coverage about her acting or singing career to be notable. Alex-h (talk) 09:48, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to

ess), at 22:06, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Melissa Camp

Melissa Camp (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats
)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely non-notable. Fails

WP:NACTOR Sulfurboy (talk) 20:57, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Sulfurboy (talk) 20:57, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:01, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 21:19, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Jeremy Camp#Personal life, where the subject is mentioned. Not actually an actor, but was Camp's first wife, who's death shortly after their marriage is included in the movie described in the article. Agree not notable, but might make a logical search term. Hog Farm (talk) 15:24, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • I'm completely fine with redirect as well. Sulfurboy (talk) 15:50, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect There is a chance there will be searches, so redirect is a good option. Moreover half of this article is copied from the Camp's. Less Unless (talk) 11:31, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Jeremy Camp#Personal life, so I think redirect is a good option. AbDaryaee (talk) 10:10, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:41, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Boris Johnson–Jennifer Arcuri story

Boris Johnson–Jennifer Arcuri story (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is duplication of material better covered in the separate articles. DGG ( talk ) 20:48, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:02, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:02, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. -- DeFacto (talk). 21:30, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete This borders of being a tabloid. The seperate articles can cover anything that we need mentioned.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:47, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom and John Pack Lambert. Not a notable incident here. Hog Farm (talk) 15:25, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete,Per nom. Don"t need a second article about the same thing. Alex-h (talk) 09:54, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:48, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Elouise

Elouise (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable. After ten years, no sign of any notable achievement, not even an album release as is reported in the article. Tuzapicabit (talk) 19:35, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:02, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:02, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:02, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:48, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fedor Belogai

Fedor Belogai (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of any notability. Fails

WP:ARTIST, just promo Gruznov (talk) 19:31, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:03, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:03, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:03, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete does not meet notability criteria for entertainers of businesspeople.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:35, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete No evidence of any notability. AbDaryaee (talk) 10:16, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:48, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Igor Khonin

Igor Khonin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of any notability. Fails

WP:ARTIST, just promo Gruznov (talk) 19:30, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:05, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:05, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:05, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:48, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Anna Borteychuk

Anna Borteychuk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of any notability. Fails

WP:GNG, just promo Gruznov (talk) 19:26, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:07, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:07, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:09, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 06:53, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Lindsey

Joseph Lindsey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats
)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of any sources to indicate notability. Inappropriately sourced using just IMDB since 2007. Little chance of improvement in the future. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 18:27, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 18:27, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 18:27, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 18:27, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 18:27, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 18:27, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 18:27, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 18:31, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 18:31, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Could technically be BLP-prodded, since no sources are present. I did not find any, either. Promotional, to boot. Kleuske (talk) 18:34, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Not notable actor....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:32, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Wikipedia is not supposed to be an IMDb mirror.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:41, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. A remnant of the old Wikipedia; clearly no other path but deletion. PK650 (talk) 07:11, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Keep or Draftify: I'm obviously outvoted here—but I don't think this article is a lost cause. There are a lot of hits for the subject on newspapers.com, and I have found sources which give him some praise for his role in Amongst Friends:
→https://www.rollingstone.com/movies/movie-reviews/amongst-friends-103078/
→https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/style/longterm/movies/videos/amongstfriendsrhinson_a0a841.htm
→https://www.newspapers.com/clip/48116327/joseph-lindsey-philadelphia-inquirer/
I'm sure there are more; it's just going to require quite a bit of digging to find them. There are many more hits at the Internet Archive, too: https://archive.org/search.php?query=%22Joseph%20Lindsey%22&sin=TXT&and%5B%5D=subject%3A%22Motion+pictures%22. His role in
WP:NACTOR. In the event of a "delete" (which seems likely), I would suggest "draftifying" as a possible solution, because, as I say, I think there is more to be found on the subject. Dflaw4 (talk) 03:57, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:43, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Danielle Hoover

Danielle Hoover (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability and zero sources (other than IMDB) in the article since 2008. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 18:03, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 18:03, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 18:03, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 18:03, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 18:03, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 18:03, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 18:03, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oklahoma-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 18:25, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Even though the article doesn't say so, the subject's more recent credits are for writing rather than acting. There are a number of Deadline Hollywood articles that mention her in that capacity (e.g., https://deadline.com/2016/10/jj-totah-star-nbc-comedy-adam-naomi-scott-1201844962/), so I would encourage voters take this into consideration when evaluating her notability. Dflaw4 (talk) 11:28, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Per Nom. A search produced nothing substantial and added Deadline source has some specific to subject but not significant coverage. Could not find anything substantial providing nothing more than a couple of sentences of a
    pseudo biography
    .
    • Comments: Source and article review
  • Reply: The review seems legit but you can check this page out, concerning eligibility to be a critic for that company, and it might give some insight as to why I would not rate the reliability very high. It may not be required but I would hold more regard to a critic that was associated with the
    ABC Radio National, Australian Film Critics Association (AFCA), also International Federation of Film Critics (FIPRESCI), and many others that would be more "prestigious". This is just my opinion but has logic if notability is questioned. Otr500 (talk) 18:44, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 06:53, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Race Owen

Race Owen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability and zero sources (other than IMDB) since 2008. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 18:00, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 18:00, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 18:00, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 18:00, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 18:00, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 18:00, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 18:25, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • John Pack Lambert, have you any view regarding the awards the subject has won? Dflaw4 (talk) 12:35, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • Unless someone adds independent 3rd party sourcing to the article supporting that he won the awards there is no reason to even consider them.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:12, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:48, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Karen Thomas (TV host)

Karen Thomas (TV host) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non notable presenter with no evidence of secondary sources online. Inappropriately sourced using just IMDB since 2008, with little chance of the article being improved. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 17:50, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 17:50, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 17:50, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 17:50, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 17:50, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 06:53, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kora Entertainment

Kora Entertainment (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Created by a user that claims to be Kent-P (according to this article, the label's CEO). I've checked for significant coverage and there doesn't seem to be any. Nominating due to lack of notability. GoodCrossing (talk) 17:13, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. GoodCrossing (talk) 17:07, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. GoodCrossing (talk) 17:07, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. GoodCrossing (talk) 17:07, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related page (created by same user) because of similar lack of notability:

Empire Avenue (record label) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
  • Delete both per nom. The references cited in both articles are not reliable and do not discuss the record labels. A Google search of both labels do not show coverage in reliable sources.  Versace1608  Wanna Talk? 18:46, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Wikipedia is not a platform for promotion nor a directory listing service. I am unable to locate any
    HighKing++ 11:22, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 06:54, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Glengarry Pipe Band

Glengarry Pipe Band (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable pipe band - no signs of significant secondary coverage. Ostrichyearning3 (talk) 15:52, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Ostrichyearning3 (talk) 15:52, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:22, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:23, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 06:54, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Leatherneck Pipes & Drums

Leatherneck Pipes & Drums (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable pipe band - can't find any signs of significant secondary coverage. Ostrichyearning3 (talk) 15:50, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Ostrichyearning3 (talk) 15:50, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:24, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:25, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:25, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete After extensive searches, I do not find the type of sources that establish notability under our guidelines. The organization has appeared in many prestigious and notable events but
    WP:NOTINHERITED applies. Articles in RS usually are little more than passing mentions of the sort: "Marching bands that are expected to be present [at X parade] include..." Actual discussion of the organization appears to be limited to message boards and pipe band fan communities. No reasonable redirect or merge target appears to be available. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 18:20, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 06:54, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Erianto

Erianto (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Searching in English, I cannot find

talk) 15:36, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the
talk) 15:36, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
Note: This discussion has been included in the
talk) 15:36, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:50, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for finding that, however, one review in ten years is not significant coverage. This sentence "But perhaps more creativity needs to be demonstrated when having another one-man show in the future." made me wonder if they had any other solo shows. Notability is established by verifiable significant coverage in several sources, and making a contribution to the culture via museum collections, etc. I don't think the review is enough. The criteria for artist's notability is
WP:ARTIST and there is nothing at this time that indicates that has been met. Netherzone (talk) 14:56, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Blind Willie Johnson. Merger from history is possible. Sandstein 06:55, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jesus Is Coming Soon

Jesus Is Coming Soon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

None notable song. It fails WP:Notability (music) on ever count. As an alternative to deletion, it could possibly be merged into Blind Willie Johnson, Although it's questionable if it's notable enough even for that. Adamant1 (talk) 14:43, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:27, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:28, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:28, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Jesus has officially came again on 39 March 2020 25:98 UTC.
    talk) 20:33, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Keep due to coverage in the last decade by NPR[1], the New Yorker,[2], and Discover magazine.[3]. Question for Adamant1, and anyone in cooperation with Adamant1: Have you heard of people talking or writing about this recording due to it relating to the pandemic? I've noticed other 1918 flu related historical topics resurfacing, and am wondering if you have come across people talking about it for this reason.--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 01:18, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
One, I don't think it's fair to say people who vote similar to each other are in cooperation with each other. Second, my only judgement (and I believe the judgement of others also) is purely based on notability through reliable in-depth sourcing. That's it. The existence of peripherally related current events or similar things like that don't factor into it. We don't keep every article about planes when a major airliner goes down etc etc. Nor should we. Outside of that, personally I haven't noticed any topics about the flu epidemic resurfacing on here, but then I wasn't really paying attention to that when I was looking at the article and deciding to do the AfD. I'm sure more people are looking it up though since it and Covid-19 are semi-related. That's not how I came across the article though. --Adamant1 (talk) 09:31, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge to Blind Willie Johnson. The NPR source does not actually talk about the song, it just puts in it a references section. The other two do mention the song, but the Discover magazine source does not provide significant coverage, being just one actual sentence of coverage and the rest being copy-pasted song lyrics. This leaves The New Yorker, which does provide significant coverage, but it is only one source, not enough to establish notability. Also per NSONG: "A standalone article is appropriate only when there is enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged to articles about an artist or album." Devonian Wombat (talk) 07:47, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge to Blind Willie Johnson per Devonian Wombat. The song fails
    WP:NSONG and since there isn't enough coverage in reliable sources, a separate article isn't warranted.  Versace1608  Wanna Talk? 14:06, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Redirect to Blind Willie Johnson: Per Devonian Wombat. ASTIG😎 (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 04:27, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.

(non-admin closure) ——SN54129 17:09, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

14th GMA Dove Awards

AfDs for this article:
14th GMA Dove Awards (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable awards ceremony. It's had a sourcing banner on it since 2010 that never got dealt with and a

WP:BEFORE search fails to come up with anything. Maybe it could be merged into GMA Dove Award, but it's questionable if it would be worth it or if that article is even notable enough itself to warrant it. Adamant1 (talk) 14:29, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 14:35, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 14:36, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep The notability of the ceremony here is not related to the use references. Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:26, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment What's it related to then? There's no guideline about the notability of awards or ceremonies except for the GNG. Which requires the use of references. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:21, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • The GNG does not require the use of references (it's a guideline, it can't require anything), it suggests that an article is likely to be notable if sufficient reliable source coverage exists, which is highly likely in the case of these awards. --Michig (talk) 09:51, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • WP:SBST, or whatever guideline though. Let alone is it the place to re-relitigate the philosophical underpinnings of notability, what an "article" is, or the purposes of Wikipedia more generally. If Walter Görlitz want's to wax poetic about any of those things more power to him, he's free to do so in the appropriate mediums. There's nothing inherently special about awards though. The vast majority of them aren't worth mentioning anywhere, let alone in Wikipedia. Even the awards main article has questionable notability and most of the sub articles about it either don't have sources or there's just a few un-reliable ones. Even for more recent award ceremonies. Like last years 50th GMA Dove Awards. Which only has one none primary source. As an "awards topic" it's not even comparable in notability to a smaller regional award like the Juno Awards. Which has great sourcing for both it's main article and the "Juno Awards of" sub articles. --Adamant1 (talk) 15:35, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Yeah, but notability requires in-depth none trivial coverage. Which isn't ascertained through articles just being "out there" or "likely" existing. So, your really splitting hairs. On your source, it's trivial, non in-depth coverage. The article isn't even about the awards. While I'd have zero problem with certain superficial facts from it being inserted into the article since that's all there is, it does nothing to establish notability. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:09, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
No, I'm not splitting hairs. You said you found nothing, I found an article about this awards ceremony in a matter of seconds, and you didn't appear to understand the distinction between sources existing and sources being cited in an article. Further coverage of this awards event found fairly easily from a Google search: [5], [6], [7], [8]. --Michig (talk) 10:25, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Per multiple newspaper articles about this awards ceremony identified above. --Michig (talk) 10:25, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I get it. You just dont get the purpose of AfD or what a keep vote should be based on. That's fine though. Ultimately I could give a crap less. If the only thing that comes out of this is a bunch of sources being added to the article, even none notable trivial ones that where ref bombed by people who dont understand the process and dont listen when told how it works, that's a still a win in my book. Its not like there can't or won't be a AfD 2.0 at some point either. Which can happen when you ref bomb bad sources to fake notability just to get your way. Altough, two keep votes at this point by people who either clearly have an agenda or are intentionally ignorant of the process really means nothing.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Adamant1 (talk • contribs)
Btw, even if it does slightly pass notability, what issue would you have with merging it to the main article as an alternative to keeping it? If it is notable it still doesnt warrant an individual article IMO because it will just be stub/list like the other articles in the same vain. So what would be the problem with merging? The question goes for Walter also. Personally, I'm not a fan of having a bunch of questionably sourced perma stubs if it can be avoided and I'm pretty sure Wikipedia more widely isnt either. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adamant1 (talk • contribs)
Please have a read of
WP:AGF. Maybe also have a read of Wikipedia:Notability. Thanks. And don't forget to sign your posts. --Michig (talk) 10:59, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
In a very similar AfD Walter said me doing it was disingenuous and claimed I only edit Christian articles because I disdain Christians. He has a history of treating me in similar ways. My commented was pointed at him and in reference to those things. While I generally respect users and abide by the no attacking rule, I'm not going to in this particular case with him. As he has repeatedly disregarded both to me and I strongly believe in the golden rule. Plus, he does have agenda. The truth is not harrasement. Calling someones action disingenuous and motivated by disdain is. I'll refrain from speaking the truth about Walter though because you requested. Adamant1 (talk) 11:27, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Btw Michig I know Wikipedia:Notability quit well, thanks. It seems like you don't though. Since none of your sources seem to talk about the ceremony in the in-depth manor required by it. An article about Amy Grant wining it is about Amy Grant, not the ceremony itself, and notability isn't inherited as I'm sure you know. So where is an in-depth article about the actual subject? If your going to tell other people read something, you should really follow it. I still so no in-depth coverage of the topic even with your sources and it doesn't take reading the notability guidelines to come that conclusion. --Adamant1 (talk) 02:32, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as per the multiple reliable sources identified by Michig above which show a pass of
    WP:Notpaper, imv Atlantic306 (talk
    )
I think your reason for not wanting to do a merge is more about editing issues then the actual benefits of doing so. Unfortunately a good portion of the GMA Dove Award article is longer then it needs to be due to being in list form and includes things that don't really need to be listed. It wouldn't really be an issue if the lists where rewritten as prose and the un-notable parts where taken out of it, but that doesn't have anything to do with if the subject here is notable enough to warrant it's own article. Which is the point in AfDs. I appreciate you at least addressing the option though. --Adamant1 (talk) 22:36, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:47, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Whisky Barrel

The Whisky Barrel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article fails

WP:NCORP Angryskies (talk) 17:06, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the
HighKing++ 14:23, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 14:37, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete No evidence in article or searches of significant coverage in independent sources. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 18:10, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 21:46, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:47, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Demijohn Limited

Demijohn Limited (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article fails

WP:NCORP. Angryskies (talk) 17:02, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the
HighKing++ 14:11, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 14:37, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 14:37, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 14:38, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Google hits are not a valid arguments for inclusion, only reliable sources are. Sandstein 06:56, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gospel Music Association

Gospel Music Association (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The articles subject doesn't meet the notability guidelines in

WP:GNG standards of in-depth coverage in multiple reliable sources. Adamant1 (talk) 14:00, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 14:38, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 14:38, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 14:39, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. There is consensus that

ess), at 21:59, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Gheorghe Axinia

Gheorghe Axinia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't see the evidence that this player passes

WP:GNG either. Govvy (talk) 13:11, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Govvy (talk) 13:14, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Govvy (talk) 13:14, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:22, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:22, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - the assertion that the
    WP:NFOOTBALL by some way. Needs improving, not deleting. GiantSnowman 17:09, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Keep per GS. --BlameRuiner (talk) 13:17, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep - Article about footballer who made over 50 appearances in the fully-pro Romanian top division. However, the only in-depth online coverage I can find is the same sources used as references in the article (from a regional newspaper for Neamț County). I think it's probably enough to satisfy the GNG, but it's close. Jogurney (talk) 19:16, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per GiantSnowman. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 16:13, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per GiantSnowman.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:27, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep 70+ appearances for CSM Ceahlăul Piatra Neamț in top tier during Communist Era? If that doesn't meet NFootball, we need to change NFootball. Surely would have had media coverage during that historic era! Nfitz (talk) 19:43, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per GiantSnowman's reasoning and arguments. Ejgreen77 (talk) 20:30, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 06:58, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

JG (rapper)

JG (rapper) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable artist. JTtheOG (talk) 10:57, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:05, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:05, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to

(non-admin closure) buidhe 03:54, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Pakistanis in Turkey

Pakistanis in Turkey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats
)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Too small diaspora, fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 07:04, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 07:37, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 07:37, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, buidhe 06:32, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:31, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Black Kite (talk) 10:50, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Bishonen | tålk 02:01, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mototaka Nakamura

Mototaka Nakamura (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a

WP:BIO indicators seem to be lacking as well. jps (talk) 10:49, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. jps (talk) 10:49, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. jps (talk) 10:49, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. jps (talk) 10:49, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Not enough reliable secondary sources mention him. I have dug around on JSTOR and Google Books. The only sources that mention him are his own works. Most of the sources on the article are his own publications.
    WP:RS are seriously lacking. Psychologist Guy (talk) 12:35, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Based on some discussion and by looking at comparable individuals, I now do not think this passes this criteria. Unless some reliable Japanese-language sources wind up rising (as noted in the comments below) to allow satisfaction of
WP:GNG, I would say Delete. Jlevi (talk) 23:45, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
One last thought. It seems like Asahi article and the Science article might be just barely enough for
WP:GNG
. Do these two articles fail on some of the criteria? Is there a reason why these articles would be insufficient if they were to pass?
Here is my analysis on the Science article. This clearly passes reliability and independence. However, it may be too specifically in reference to the article subject's research to be considered an article about the subject himself. So, though it is a long article, the subject perhaps does not receive the necessary coverage. I'm not sure how the research/researcher disentanglement is usually done for this sort of article.
Here is my analysis on the Asahi article. The coverage appears significant, crossing the
organizations
).
Thoughts? There are certainly significant NPOV and weight problems here, but those shouldn't necessarily impact notability, and I'd like to give this article the strongest possible counter-argument to deletion. I think what I've presented here is that strongest counterargument. Jlevi (talk) 16:40, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with you that the Science article is merely a glancing mention of the subject. The Asahi article makes a better case, though it is pretty marginal. I do note that
WP:NPROF case was anywhere close, the Asahi article might change my mind. But it's not, and it doesn't. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 07:40, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
WP:FRINGEBLP says,

There are people who are notable enough to have articles included in Wikipedia solely on the basis of their advocacy of fringe beliefs. Notability can be determined by considering whether there are enough reliable and independent sources that discuss the person in a serious and extensive manner, taking care also to avoid the pitfalls that can appear when determining the notability of fringe theories themselves. Caution should be exercised when evaluating whether there are enough sources available to write a neutral biography that neither unduly promotes nor denigrates the subject.

This does not increase the standard. If anything it lowers the standard and adds support to KEEP (article creator). -- Yae4 (talk) 09:45, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
Russ_Woodroofe Sounds fair. Jlevi (talk) 21:01, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - A few days ago I tried looking for more sources indicating notability and to find better independent coverage (including expert criticism and mentions in wide mainstream papers). I mostly fell on advocacy org sites and blogs, including
    WP:TOOSOON and Wikipedia is not the place to popularize things. —PaleoNeonate – 01:22, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
    ]
In addition to having significant impact in his esoteric technical field, his "confessions" book brought a lot of general public attention. This person has been covered in Science[10], and Asahi Shimbun[11], plus some other publications. Japanese language searches may find more coverage.
There is no specific numerical criterion available to apply, but I feel having dozens of citations for some works, totalling hundreds over the years, should be sufficient when considering the very specialized nature of the works.
General Comments: A technocracy source[12] was deleted, rather than talk about it more, but it added a few comments to the quadrant source, so it also demonstrates additional coverage of this person and his work, from an arguably reliable source. This article was written without using any source I thought was of questionable quality/reliability; however, there is a lot of additional coverage of the person, his work, his "breaking ranks" and becoming notorious in the blogosphere, and in articles that will take more time to go through and form opinions on reliability and weight.
Detailed Comments: He has 14 technical publications listed at American Meteorological Society, which no one should claim is "fringe." [13]
Google Scholar search results and citations.[14]
Collapse Detailed list of publications with year and numbers of citations noted
This article in Science, shows the person and his work, had impact, early in career.
Climate modeling's fudge factor comes under fire, RA Kerr - Science, 1994 - go.gale.com, … In a study now in press at the Journal of Climate, Mototaka Nakamura, Peter Stone, and Jochem Marotzke of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) report that they deliberately introduced an error into a climate model, then seemingly adjusted the error away, only to … Cited: 41
It is not insignificant that M. Nakamura is second author of "The role of high-and low-frequency dynamics in blocking formation" (cited 268 times) and two M. Nakamura works are cited as references therein:[15]
(1) 1994: Characteristics of potential vorticity mixing by breaking Rossby waves in the vicinity of a jet. Ph.D. dissertation, Cited 18 times
(2) 1994: The effects of flow asymmetry on the direction of Rossby wave breaking. J. Atmos. Sci.,51, 2031–2045. Cited 72 times
Other citations, as primary author, reverse order by year, bolded because of a comment about "the 1990s":
  • Impacts of the Oyashio temperature front on the regional climate, M Nakamura, T Miyama - Journal of Climate, 2014 - journals.ametsoc.org, Zitiert von: 13
  • Greenland Sea surface temperature change and accompanying changes in the Northern Hemispheric climate, M Nakamura - Journal of climate, 2013 - journals.ametsoc.org, Zitiert von: 4
  • Impacts of SST anomalies in the Agulhas Current system on the regional climate variability, M Nakamura - Journal of climate, 2012 - journals.ametsoc.org, Zitiert von: 14
  • Quasigeostrophic transient wave activity flux: Updated climatology and its role in polar vortex anomalies, M Nakamura, M Kadota… - Journal of the atmospheric …, 2010 - journals.ametsoc.org, Zitiert von: 5
  • Dominant anomaly patterns in the near-surface baroclinicity and accompanying anomalies in the atmosphere and oceans. Part II: North Pacific basin; M Nakamura, S Yamane - Journal of climate,2010 - journals.ametsoc.org, Zitiert von: 26
  • Potential vorticity and eddy potential enstrophy in the North Atlantic Ocean simulated by a global eddy-resolving model, M Nakamura, T Kagimoto - Dynamics of atmospheres and oceans, 2006 - Zitiert von: 15
  • Dominant anomaly patterns in the near-surface baroclinicity and accompanying anomalies in the atmosphere and oceans. Part I: North Atlantic basin, M Nakamura, S Yamane - Journal of climate, 2009 - journals.ametsoc.org, Zitiert von: 32
  • Transient wave activity and its fluxes in the North Atlantic Ocean simulated by a global eddy-resolving model, M Nakamura, T Kagimoto - Dynamics of atmospheres and oceans, 2006 - Elsevier, Zitiert von: 5
  • A simulation study of the 2003 heatwave in Europe, M Nakamura, T Enomoto, S Yamane - J Earth Sim, 2005 - jamstec.go.jp, Zitiert von: 24
  • Diagnoses of an eddy-resolving Atlantic Ocean model simulation in the vicinity of the Gulf Stream. Part II: Eddy potential enstrophy and eddy potential vorticity fluxes, M Nakamura, Y Chao - Journal of physical oceanography, 2002 - journals.ametsoc.org, Zitiert von: 3
  • Diagnoses of an eddy-resolving Atlantic Ocean model simulation in the vicinity of the Gulf Stream. Part I: Potential vorticity, M Nakamura, Y Chao - Journal of physical oceanography, 2001 - journals.ametsoc.org, Zitiert von: 11
  • Characteristics of three‐dimensional quasi‐geostrophic transient eddy propagation in the vicinity of a simulated Gulf Stream, M Nakamura, Y Chao - Journal of Geophysical Research …, 2000 - Wiley Online Library, Zitiert von: 10
  • On the eddy isopycnal thickness diffusivity of the Gent–McWilliams subgrid mixing parameterization, M Nakamura, Y Chao - Journal of climate, 2000 - journals.ametsoc.org, Cited 38 times
  • On modified rotational and divergent eddy fluxes and their application to blocking diagnoses, M Nakamura - Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological …, 1998 - Wiley Online Library, Zitiert von: 6
  • Effects of ice albedo and runoff feedbacks on the thermohaline circulation, M Nakamura - Journal of climate, 1996 - journals.ametsoc.org, Zitiert von: 17
  • Destabilization of the thermohaline circulation by atmospheric eddy transports, M Nakamura, PH Stone, J Marotzke - Journal of Climate, 1994 - journals.ametsoc.org, Cited 152 times
-- Yae4 (talk) 02:24, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Citations are only moderate in a high citation field, and I don't see other signs of notability. I'm concerned at how the article uses his past affiliations to give him a veneer of respectability (if he has a current academic post, I can't find it). A single book (self-publisher even?) isn't likely to give
    WP:NAUTHOR, and the coverage mostly consists of the review by Tony Thomas and various rehashes. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 08:52, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Russ_Woodroofe, His lengthy dissertation published by MIT should count as a second book, FWIW. -- Yae4 (talk) 17:39, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment (by article creator). For what it's worth, comparison with other Meteorologist articles... In terms of sourcing and accomplishments, Mototaka Nakamura seems at least as notable and well-sourced as some other meteorologist BLP articles such as Nana Klutse, Reto Knutti, Peter_Cox_(climatologist), Robert H. Johns, Rely Zlatarovic.
Most of the more "highly cited" articles are the "study of studies" type Wikipedia relies on so heavily, or less specialized/focused or more policy type works. As for employment, "coming out" as a non-alarmist or honestly publicizing the high uncertainties of climate model predictions are usually career ending moves. A few other examples have even made it into Wikipedia... Nakamura wrote what sounds like a goodbye to the field, "I have more-or-less lost interest in the climate science and am not thrilled to spend so much of my time and energy in this kind of writing beyond the point that satisfies my own sense of obligation to the US and Japanese tax payers who financially supported my higher education and spontaneous and free research activity." -- Yae4 (talk) 13:37, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure the meteorologists brought up for comparison support this argument. Just looking at Reto Knutti's publications, this individual has five publications with 1000+ citations, and >20 with 200+. If these people are used for the purpose of comparison, it seems the argument would be for delete based on the comparison. Jlevi (talk) 16:29, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure either, but my point was Nakamura Wikipedia article is better, and better sourced. It looks to me like Knutti is 2nd or 3rd author on most of the highly cited publications. Maybe Klutse[16] is a closer comparison (by primary author counts). Zlatarovic is too old to use Google scholar. I don't claim Nakamura is the most prolific or most cited, but he is in the ballpark of some others in Wikipedia, at least. Plus his work got arguably more notoriety (or infamy) for the general public. -- Yae4 (talk) 17:48, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Article status/quality/completeness is unrelated to notability, which is the primary purpose of this discussion. For more information, consider looking at
WP:ARTN. Jlevi (talk) 02:52, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 11:06, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, there is. I see a volunteer already added it, but in general you can ask at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting for someone who has the tools enabled to list discussions efficiently. I use WP:Twinkle which does all the sorting at set-up, but there are other volunteers who add these discussions to other lists after the fact. jps (talk) 11:14, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Eh, delete I think - the sources cited are almost all primary (e.g. mentioned on climate change denialist blog, source, link to climate change denialist blog) and there really isn't much else out there, in part because the sources that do discuss him are almost always unreliable (e.g. they promote climate change denial). Guy (help!) 16:38, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Citation profile too underwhelming to pass
    talk) 00:05, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
    ]
XOR%27easter, I should be more appreciative of someone using a numerical criterion as you did. So thanks for that. Could you point me to a (open/free) source to get those ratings (for authors who don't have profiles/accounts on GScholar)? Also, would you state a minimum value you think should be used, or give the values for the lowest rated similar BLP already in WP, for context, if you know? -- Yae4 (talk) 17:39, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • NOTE: Per
    WP:BASIC
    : People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject.
In addition to Nakamura's significant coverage published in Asahi Shimbun,[1] Science,[2] Manila Times,[3] The Telegram,[4] and a few "lesser" news publications, I recently found and added his significant coverage within newsletters published by IPRC, including one with a detailed biography.[5] Also added significant coverage from a few notable blogs (having Wikipedia articles). These publishers are all independent of each other and independent of the subject. -- Yae4 (talk) 07:08, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ "Researcher predicts cooler climate in Northern Hemisphere from 2015 - AJW by The Asahi Shimbun". web.archive.org. 2013-11-22. Retrieved 2020-04-01.
  2. PMID 17801523
    .
  3. ^ "Climate modeler exposes the lie in climate change scare". The Manila Times. Retrieved 2020-03-23.
  4. ^ Contributed. "LETTER: Climate change yes, extremism no | The Telegram". www.thetelegram.com. Retrieved 2020-03-23.
  5. ^ "IPRC News, New IPRC Staff, Mototaka Nakamura" (PDF). web.archive.org. 2010-06-10. Retrieved 2020-04-03.
There is no "lie" in the climate change "scare", and any publication declaring that someone has "exposed" one is ipso facto unreliable. The item from The Telegram is a reader letter in a local newspaper, carrying zero reliability or noteworthiness, and it has only a passing mention of the article subject at that. The IPRC newsletter is published by Nakamura's employer and is therefore not independent; it would only be suitable for uncontroversial claims like the date at which he joined the organization and, for these purposes, contributes nothing to notability.
talk) 16:04, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
Even Wikipedia doesn't yet say we need to be scared to go along with "the consensus." Newspaper editors give submitted letters editorial oversight; they don't just publish them willy nilly. An employee may be financially dependent on an employer, but the requirement is intellectual independence, which is satisfied. -- Yae4 (talk) 17:43, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
First, we're not "scared" into agreeing with the scientific consensus.
talk) 18:16, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
Well said, —PaleoNeonate – 03:18, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@XOR'easter:I get the feeling you're intentionally misinterpreting what I wrote about "scare," so I'll give up on that. But, Dana Nuccitelli and John Cook are considered experts...because they published in Environmental Research Letters (zero sources)? -- Yae4 (talk) 10:53, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Collapse Process Objection Re: When Not to use deletion process - personal beliefs
  • Process Objection (by Article creator) (Restated after unexplained reversion): When to Not Use Deletion Process says a reason is: "Articles on topics you wish didn't exist for personal belief reasons". I feel this may be the primary reason this AfD was started. Thus, this AfD is improper, and should be ended. I ask impartial admins (if possible to find) to please evaluate.
Suggested data for evaluation:
Wikipedia:Fringe_theories/Noticeboard#Mototaka_Nakamura started 19:04, 30 March 2020 (Rallying cry?)
User_talk:Yae4#Warning 16:41, 31 March 2020: "Warning"
followed 18 hours later by this AfD. 10:49, 1 April 2020
This interaction comparison to identify timing and articles/talks.
Talk:Judith_Curry Examine language used by participants also involved here now.
AfD Edit summaries [17][18]
-- Yae4 (talk) 13:27, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
FWIW, I had no involvement with this page before the AfD, and I second the nomination. The objection is anyway off-topic for the AfD (better suited for
WP:BLUDGEON, and consider whether some of the points therein apply to your behavior at this AfD. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 15:06, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
Thanks for the suggestion. I've also added it above for the long list of articles and citations, and updated the title. I find most WP discussions are too light on actual evidence, specific measurable criteria, and too heavy on unsubstantiated opinions, so I try to bring details. -- Yae4 (talk) 15:35, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:24, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tan Yan Zhang

Tan Yan Zhang (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of this biography is not

BEFORE search yielded nothing. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 02:26, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 02:26, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 02:26, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yunshui 雲水 09:23, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 20:51, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bangkok Bus Line 1

Bangkok Bus Line 1 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Just another non notable, run of the mill, bus route that doesn't need special treatment by having its own article. Ajf773 (talk) 08:52, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 08:52, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 08:52, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui 雲水 08:47, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

David Koehn

David Koehn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

WP:POET, non-notable as a university teacher or tech entrepreneur. Article previously deleted twice and salted, author created under David Koehn (poet) to bypass but was later moved to David Koehn ~riley (talk) 07:42, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. ~riley (talk) 07:42, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. ~riley (talk) 07:42, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. ~riley (talk) 07:42, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete : Not a notable university teacher or tech entrepreneur. - Sanyam.wikime (talk) 10:35, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - for as far as I can see, the subject isn't notable. --MrClog (talk) 20:43, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I see that someone has been name-dropping in this article in the last half-hour without any sources. That is counter-productive. To save this we need independent reliable sources with significant coverage of Koehn.
    Phil Bridger (talk) 16:09, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Delete: Given lack of lack of notability and, well, being deleted and salted. — Javert2113 (Siarad.|¤) 00:08, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • The names included were included the same way as on the Dean Rader page and this names are all connected to referenceable sources (for example the names listed in the article are refenceable here: https://www.omnidawn.com/prosody-online-workshop/. This person is more esteemed, has more awards, more references, and more books than other authors in the same press...as an example see Jackie Craven. The current attitude of the flags indicate inequitable flags relative to other successful Wiki posts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.205.15.71 (talk) 15:08, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • That is the opposite of an independent source, because (it was claimed here) Koehn is on the board of directors of the publisher. And we are discussing this particular article here. There may be others that should be deleted, but they should be discussed separately.
    Phil Bridger (talk) 15:42, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Norma Cole is also on the Omnidawn board. This does not impact her references to Omnidawn. The workshop is an independent offering by Koehn where the proceeds are donated to Omnidawn. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.205.15.71 (talk) 15:57, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • It certainly should disqualify references to Omnidawn as independent in the article about Cole. As I said above, we are discussing Koehn here, not Cole.
    Phil Bridger (talk) 16:01, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.

(non-admin closure) ——SN54129 17:25, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

SEPECAT

SEPECAT (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page contains nothing that isn't already on SEPECAT Jaguar and is just an unnecessary fork of that page. SEPECAT was a one product entity. This page should be deleted or replaced by a REDIRECT to SEPECAT Jaguar. Here is a diff showing what was there before a whole lot of content from SEPECAT Jaguar was put on the page: [24] Mztourist (talk) 05:18, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Mztourist (talk) 05:20, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Mztourist (talk) 05:21, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Transall was also a 'one product entity', not a valid rationale for article deletion. I would be very disappointed to be redirected to the Jaguar article if I was interested in SEPECAT. Manufacturing companies/organisations of aircraft are almost always notable and have their own article, even individual people have articles, eg Jim Bede. Splitting an article like this is recommended per Wikipedia:Summary style...A fuller treatment of any major subtopic should go in a separate article of its own.
If an editor discovered a fantastic reference source on SEPECAT how would they advance the subject to
Featured article status if it is not covered by its own article? Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 09:44, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
I note that the courtesy of notifying the article creator and associated wiki project has not happened (per
WP:AFD). Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 10:03, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
Featured article status" is highly unlikely, but if it were the case they could just create a new page. I am not obliged to notify the article creator and my comments: Talk:SEPECAT#Is this a necessary fork? have been on the Talk Page since 14 February (when the page was only 2 sentences), giving all interested parties plenty of time to respond. SEPECAT and Transall each contain minimal information about the companies, but they have been plumped up with information about their sole product to justify the existence of separate pages.Mztourist (talk) 10:19, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. It appears this was created by a friend of the subject of the article. I'll follow up things that might need to be done. Shirt58 (talk) 09:18, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alayzah Foster

Alayzah Foster (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

talk) 04:50, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the
talk) 04:50, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
Note: This discussion has been included in the
talk) 04:50, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
Note: This discussion has been included in the
talk) 04:50, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 06:58, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Counterword

AfDs for this article:
Counterword (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

this seems to be more of a dictionary entry rather than a page that is concerned with the technique of using counterwords in speech/writing Katnotcat (talk) 04:50, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:17, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui 雲水 08:48, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas O. Jones

Thomas O. Jones (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Businessman who operates a Wendy's franchise and started a few non-notable businesses. References are primarily websites of former employers (mostly gone now). I can't find anything that would qualify as significant coverage from an independent, reliable source. Glendoremus (talk) 04:29, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the
userdude 05:38, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
Note: This discussion has been included in the
userdude 05:38, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
Note: This discussion has been included in the
userdude 05:38, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. No sock arguments have been taken into consideration, but consensus remains clearly against deleting the article. However,

(non-admin closure) ——SN54129 17:32, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Joshua Ip

Joshua Ip (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not appear to meet the notability guidelines in

WP:POET. He has not written any works that are transformational, original or a significant public monument. In the news, coverage of him is only in passing, and most of the other sources are blogs. He does not appear to be widely cited by peers, or as having influenced any notable poets. I cannot see any justification for retaining this as an encyclopedia entry. Kohlrabi Pickle (talk) 03:48, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

  • Keep - Based on
    WP:ANYBIO, the subject has won multiple national-level awards in his field, including the Young Artist Award and Singapore Literature Prize, which are the highest national-level awards for a young artist and a published manuscript respectively. Also, a check of Google Scholar reveals multiple citations from notable sources such as peer-reviewed academic journals – regular inclusions in the annual “Malaysia and Singapore” digest of the Journal of Commonwealth Literature, the “Contemporary Literature from Singapore” article in the Oxford Research Encylopedia of Literature 2017, introductions of Singapore Literature in English and other books. Google News includes significant coverage in multiple national newspapers, inclusive of reviews, interviews and articles. Lightsup112 (talk) 11:14, 3 April 2020 (UTC) — Lightsup112 (talk • contribs) is blocked as a sock puppet of Desapar (talk • contribs). [reply
    ]
Lightsup112 can you attach these sources you mention? Google News coverage that I found was not significant, covering the subject in passing only. Kohlrabi Pickle (talk) 11:37, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Just to weigh in on the rest. Even assuming that you are correct (still waiting for the links) about citation in peer-reviewed academic journals; this is not enough to establish notability. The subject must be widely cited, which indicates their authority in their field. The only news coverage I could find includes blogs (not a reliable source,
WP:RSOPINION). There is some coverage in The Straits Times, but these are (1) some pieces written by the subject, and not about the subject, and (2) reviews of his books, but not coverage of him. There is not a single source of significant coverage in a reliable third party source that I can find to establish the subject's notability, not even following his winning the Singapore Literature Prize. The Singapore Literature Prize is a significant achievement, but whether this is enough to establish the winner's notability is dubious. The subject has himself said it has weak recognition even in Singapore: [26] that "while the prize has some cachet within the community ... it has some way to go in terms of recognition by a wider Singaporean audience." All this adds up to: why should the subject warrant an entry in an encyclopedia? Kohlrabi Pickle (talk) 16:09, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
Coolabahapple,
  • How can it be correct that a person is deserving of an encyclopedia entry because one of their books has been reviewed by one newspaper? This is setting the bar very, very low indeed, and would flood Wikipedia with entries. This doesn't even fulfil the notability criteria for the book, which requires coverage in (per
    WP:BK
    ) two or more non-trivial sources.
  • The comparison with high British orders cannot be correct; no one who has refused a high British order has done so because it is not notable. In fact, they would have done so precisely because of how well-known it is, so that refusing to accept the honour makes a statement of principle. The point I am making is that (1) the Singapore Literature Prize is poorly recognised in Singapore, and (2) the subject has himself said this in a well known publication (and as a recipient, he is something of an authority on the subject). If a Singaporean literature prize is not even well recognised by a Singaporean audience, what claim can it have to generating notability?
  • I would also point out this, very importantly: the person needs to be notable enough to warrant their own biographical entry. If the person is defined solely in terms of a single event, then perhaps it would make sense for an entry for the book, but not for the author. I cannot find any sources covering the subject in detail. Kohlrabi Pickle (talk) 03:46, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • 1) i did not say that one review means that someone meets wp:author, only that reviews (note the plural) indicate that, i then gave one example;
  • 2) please provide sources that back up your statement that the SLP is "is poorly recognised in Singapore" and not just from an apparently (from your pov anyway:)) non-notable person (i note that the wikarticle on the SLP has nothing about this), ditto (sources please) with your statement "no one who has refused a high British order has done so because it is not notable. In fact, they would have done so precisely because of how well-known it is", i don't see that reason at List of people who have declined a British honour, unfortunately The Guardian doesn't say much here on why (the number one reason for refusal of australian honors (that are based on the british system) according to the Herald Sun btw is not because they're notable but due to "modesty" - "Leading Australians snub Order of Australia honours");
  • 3) agree that, in the majority of cases, if someone is known for one event/book, then that event/book might warrent an article, not the person. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:18, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
1. Fine. As you say, no. 3 of
WP:AUTHOR says that multiple independent reviews make an author likely to be notable. If you are able to attach any other reviews of the same book, this would go some way to justifying your point. I, for one, could not find any. I saw one here: [27], but the subject is himself an editor of that journal, so I don't think the source qualifies as independent coverage. (I stand corrected) (Kohlrabi Pickle (talk) 16:25, 4 April 2020 (UTC))[reply
]
2. My point is that the subject is not notable enough to warrant an encyclopedia entry. This does not mean that nothing he says deserves notice. As a recipient of the award, he is perfectly placed to opine that it is not well recognised, and he did so in a well known publication. The same 2018 article quotes "writers and publishers" as saying that the prize's impact on sales is "negligible". They say that "the prize struggles to move beyond preaching to the converted". The article also says that the prize has not propelled its winners onto the Straits Times bestseller list, with a "rare" exception of
HLA Hart who believed that state honours should only be given for public service, or Stephen Hawking
, who did not like titles. No one on that list would seriously suggest that British honours are not notable, the way Joshua Ip suggests that the Singapore Literature Prize is not notable.
3. There might be a case for that here - one of Joshua Ip's books receiving an article, but not him. There are simply too few sources from which to construct a reliable picture of him, and this might simply be because he is not notable enough for one. Though I would point out that even his Singapore Literature Prize winning anthology sonnets from the singlish has hardly any coverage beyond bookshops and Cha Literary Journal, which as I said above, Joshua Ip is an editor of. Kohlrabi Pickle (talk) 06:40, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • KEEP. Subject has been conferred several national awards, including the Singapore Literature Prize in 2014 and Young Artist of the Year in 2017. This qualifies the subject as notable, under notability guidelines WP:ANYBIO ("The person has received a well-known and significant award or honor, or has been nominated for such an award several times."). Significant transformational content is not a prerequisite for entry. Desapar (talk) 02:04, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Have responded to this point above. Kohlrabi Pickle (talk) 07:33, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

*Keep - WP:GNG

  • Significant coverage of the subject's work in peer-reviewed journals,<[28][29], citations in introductions of scholarly books on Singaporean Literature by notable presses [30], coverage in encyclopedic entries on the topic, [31],
  • Multiple reviews of the subject's work in multiple newspapers[32],[33][34], multiple independent literary journals[35][36][37].
  • Multiple national-level awards, including the Singapore Literature Prize and Golden Point Award, [38] and the Young Artist Award, " Singapore’s highest accolade for young arts practitioners who show promise of artistic excellence in the fields of dance, theatre, music, literature, photography, art and film."[39] A cursory comparison reveals that there is no other Singaporean writer in English who has been awarded all of these three. 2401:7400:4003:E1AE:1F7:3337:F823:4FEB (talk) 09:05, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • In addition, some examples in passing of significant coverage of subject in literary essay collections by peer [40][41], being taught in course syllabi at university-level[42], inclusion in commercially-available educational material.[43]2401:7400:4003:E1AE:1F7:3337:F823:4FEB (talk) 09:05, 4 April 2020 (UTC) — 2401:7400:4003:E1AE:1F7:3337:F823:4FEB is blocked as a sock puppet of Desapar (talk • contribs). [reply]
I will let others weigh in, but here's my take.
  • There are only two good sources in this list: [3] and [16]. Everything else is sparse, especially the newspaper coverage. The journal entries are useful, but the engagement does not suggest anything seminal about his work. As such, it generates about the same kind of notability value as a junior academic, and junior academics do not warrant Wikipedia biographies.
  • Here's an example of good newspaper coverage. It is of the "peer" you cited - Koh Jee Leong, [44], and is of a full profile of the subject. His work has also been recommended as a top book by the Financial Times. Even he doesn't yet have a Wikipedia page. Wherever Joshua Ip is quoted in newspapers, it is just in passing or a routine review of a book.
  • The Golden Point Award recognises promise of artistic excellence. But an encyclopedia chronicles notable achievements, not the potential for them. A
    Rhodes scholar
    , for example, does not get a Wikipedia article simply for being a Rhodes scholar.
  • As far as I can see, Joshua Ip's strongest claim to fame is the Singapore Literature Prize. This would ordinarily be enough for me, but I am conflicted for the following reasons:
  1. This isn't the Booker Prize or the Nobel Prize for Literature. It's a national award. For this reason, the bar is higher to show that it is a well-known and significant award or honour. (per
    WP:ANYBIO
    )
  2. Its notability is dubious even for its target audience. Singapore's largest daily newspaper has quoted writers (including Joshua Ip!) and publishers saying that it is not widely recognised by Singaporeans.
For these reasons, I find it hard to accept that he warrants an encyclopedia biography for having won the SLP. Kohlrabi Pickle (talk) 12:15, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Kohlrabi Pickle (talk) 03:48, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Kohlrabi Pickle (talk) 03:48, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. Kohlrabi Pickle (talk) 03:48, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. Kohlrabi Pickle (talk) 03:48, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • KEEP. The subject may not have received very much international coverage, but he is much-discussed in the Singaporean press. A cursory search on https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/ reveals that his name has appeared 74 times since 2012. (The articles are sadly paywalled.)
  • Furthermore, if one demands that all subjects on Wikipedia must receive international coverage in order be deemed encyclopedia-worthy, that excludes most writers from small nations, especially those who do not write in English. A cursory look at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Singaporean_poets reveals entries by Singaporean writers who have accomplished less, such as Rebecca Chua, Sng Boh Kim, Muhammad Jailani Abu Talib and Teo Poh Leng.
  • Kohlrabi Pickle also erroneously states that the subject is an editor of Cha journal. The journal itself does not list him as such. https://www.asiancha.com/content/view/3022/640/ Ng.yisheng 15:41, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
As far as I know, there is no expectation of international coverage by Wikipedia policies. My issue is that his press coverage is cursory. If this is because I brought up the Financial Times, I would be satisfied with Ip's books appearing on the Straits Times bestseller list or being recommended as a top book by the Straits Times, which would at least indicate notability in Singapore. It seems from online sources that the books are neither bestsellers, nor has anyone suggested that they are transformative or a significant literary contribution. I would be very happy to be proven wrong. I stand corrected about Cha Literary Journal - I had opened a past issue where he was a guest editor. I have stricken out the erroneous statements in my text above. Kohlrabi Pickle (talk) 16:25, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep having read through the provided sources, as well as additional sources linked here, I think that the subject falls short of cleanly meeting GNG. However, it's clear that he receives critical attention for his work, and national literature prizes go a fair way toward meeting ANYBIO. Additionally, because the subject writes in Chinese in addition to English, there's a solid chance that there's additional coverage of his work in other languages. I would feel more strongly about this vote if either we already had articles for the awards that Ip has won (establishing their notability), or if it was clear that a large portion of Ip's work was non-English, but I think that there's reason to believe that
    WP:NPOSSIBLE has been met. signed, Rosguill talk 17:44, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. The arguments are basically, "There's enough good sources to meet

WP:BEANS. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:50, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Impact of the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic on the cannabis industry

talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats
)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Hyperspecific topic of relatively insignificant encyclopedic value. Coverage cannot be sustained as its only a few months old and unlike the virus itself, we have no clue if the pot industry will be impacted. In other words, if fails

WP:N as its too new to see if this has a lasting impact. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:21, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Sources
  • Please read
    WP:NOTTEMPORARY, which shows that notability has already been achieved. The page, and topic, are notable. And as I say below, the topic of cannabis prohibition is directly involved in this, as the "essential status" given to industry outlets in an historical shutdown puts emphasis on the ongoing end of prohibition. I'd also point out that many more sources have been added since the start of this discussion. Randy Kryn (talk) 23:43, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 15:19, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 15:19, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 15:19, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of COVID-19-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 15:19, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: Passes
    Socio-economic impact of the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic. --MarioGom (talk) 15:32, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui 雲水 08:50, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

American Sheriff

American Sheriff (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No references, and no indication of notability. No wiki links other than to the members of the group. No notable or significant works listed. Suggest merging existing content (3 sentences) into the pages about members of the group. Dmoore5556 (talk) 01:12, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Dmoore5556 (talk) 01:12, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 09:06, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. This is on the edge between "no consensus" and "keep", but proponents of keeping the article have made a reasonable argument as to the extent of sources available. BD2412 T 21:44, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Benno Bikes

Benno Bikes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of any notability. One source discusses aquisttions which fails to mention the subject, the other reads like a press release issued when it launched. Searches reveal the usual tranche of social media and advertising offerings but nothing substantial. Created by an SPA who created the article after the required 10 trivial edits. Looks like COI or paid editing. Fails

WP:GNG  Velella  Velella Talk   01:05, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cycling-related deletion discussions.  Velella  Velella Talk   01:05, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  Velella  Velella Talk   01:05, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's
list of content for rescue consideration. Lightburst (talk) 14:11, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 14:12, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of Businesses-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 14:12, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
Comment- No, and it makes no difference what I have heard of or not heard of. This AfD is based on the Wikipedia test of notability, nothing more.  Velella  Velella Talk   01:22, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per the article citing sources. 159.100.164.63 (talk) 12:38, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, trivial coverage. Which isn't the case for Mongoose or whatever. I'm not seeing the "substance" in the article either. --Adamant1 (talk) 15:17, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Of the three sources one is primary, one does not seem to mention Benno. The other may well be typical press handout about a company launch. Not seeing any real notability.Slatersteven (talk) 15:30, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete A search for references yields lots of press releases in bike industry magazines and a few passing mentions (so-and-so bike shop stocks Benno Bikes). Glendoremus (talk) 15:57, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Notable bike company per
    WP:NEXIST
    . There are many sources available.
  1. Cycling Industry
  2. Bikebiz
  3. BusinessDen
  4. Bicycle Retailer
  5. Forbes (Contributor)
  6. Tagblatt (German language)
  7. Pedelecs and E-Bikes German
  8. Ride German

Lightburst (talk) 22:24, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Like usual, none of this has depth and most of these are minor niche blogs or magazines. Praxidicae (talk) 22:32, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
An editor sees what they want to see. Notability is determined in this way. Carry on Lightburst (talk) 00:08, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Here's the full extent of mention in reference #3 above: "Sense said about 20 bikes will be kept on the sales floor from brands Opus Bikes, Benno Bikes and WorkCycles...". As I noted above, only passing mentions and nothing that qualifies as notable coverage per
    WP:GNG
    .
  • Delete as per my previous comments here and Glendoremus/Slatersteven. Praxidicae (talk) 17:23, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Sigh: Disingenuous cherry picking Lightburst (talk) 23:35, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Repeatedly, I might add. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 21:12, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The Benno Bike newspaper clip board settles this. You folks didn't bother to look very hard (or at least not thoroughly) for the sources that establish notability.
The
Argumentum ad hominem. No Guilt by Association. The moveant makes illogical arguments that are of no worth at all. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 12:03, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
Comment -
WP:ORGCRIT , which applies in thhis case, states at the very beginning "significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. ". What we have is many fleeting mentions , press releases etc and one single source that deals with one model produced by the company and not the company itself, for which we have no RSs. This does not provide grounds for a Keep vote!.  Velella  Velella Talk   03:06, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
What we have here is
WP:AGF. Cheers. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 10:52, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
I am unable to locate a single reference that meets the criteria for establishing notability. The topic therefore fails GNG/
HighKing++ 16:40, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 06:59, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dhruba Joetirmoya Gope

Dhruba Joetirmoya Gope (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable police officer. Fails

WP:GNG (Lacks significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject). There are 31 refs in the article, all of them are routine coverage & just mentioned the person name (passing mention), some of refs even doesn't mentioned the person name & others are directory. The Bangladesh Police Medal-Service (bpm-seba) isn't a notable award (not enough for a standalone article), every year at least 100+ police personal receive this award. The person who created this article, looks like very close to the subject, just look at this photo took by article creator. This article was speedy deleted twice on bnwiki. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 00:53, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the
userdude 01:42, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
Note: This discussion has been included in the
userdude 01:42, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Though I don't thing so. Let's wait to add more references. Bangla wiki will be back soon. And you deleted the bangla wiki and that means that you have personal connection with him. Sorry to say. --Khonika (talk) 04:55, 1 April 2020 (UTC) -- Sock master (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Khonika)[reply]

Thank you. It's not a well-known and significant award e.g. not like Ekushey Padak. Number decrease does not mean its became significant. I'm sure not just in Bangladesh, every country's police has this type of award, it's given by government doesn't mean everyone who received are automatically notable. otherwise we can start creating thousand of thousand article like this. The person shouldn't get an automatic article just because person received Bangladesh Police Medal (Service). And for Dhruba Joetirmoya Gope, You won't find even one significant coverage in reliable sources (only some passing mention). --আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 22:18, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to

Impact of the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic on science and technology#Telecommunications. Sandstein 11:50, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Teleconferencing in the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic

Teleconferencing in the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats
)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG and could easily be mentioned in a sentence as a collateral effect of COVID-19 in one of the numerous pages regarding the pandemic PenulisHantu (talk) 00:40, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. PenulisHantu (talk) 00:40, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • PenulisHantu, In which of the "numerous pages regarding the pandemic" could it be mentioned, while remaining within the scope of the specific article? · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 09:27, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - I usually lean more on
    WP:RAPID, and have !voted delete on a few of these coronavirus/culture intersection articles, but there are an awful lot of sources about the radical and urgent changes in education, many fields of employment, communication among friends/family, etc. that all revolves around teleconferencing. Some of that can be included in other articles, but I think this is a reasonable topic for a stand-alone page -- and potentially an article that others could merge to. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 00:54, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -KAP03 (Talk • Contributions • Email) 06:01, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -KAP03 (Talk • Contributions • Email) 06:01, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -KAP03 (Talk • Contributions • Email) 06:02, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete We have several separate kind of long articles regarding the impact of COVID-19 on different fields and this article has been written as a stub which is irrelevant. The effect on teleconferencing can be mentioned in sentences rather than creating a separate article on this issue. Abishe (talk) 12:36, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Abishe, which articles are you referring to? One of them may be a good target for a merge. · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 09:22, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete This isn't worthy of it's own article. There's no reason it can't just be mentioned in a general impact of Covid-19 article instead or something. It's to soon anyway. The craps effects just started. --Adamant1 (talk) 15:20, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep if is expanded with sourced information which is too large to be in an existing article, Merge with an existing article otherwise. --a3nm (talk) 16:32, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Move to draft space. On 17:28, 29 March 2020, Pharos added to Zoom Video Communications#Use during the COVID-19 pandemic the helpful (?) link "{{main|Coronavirus impact on teleconferencing}}". At that time, this article we're discussing here consisted of one, unsourced sentence. I find that edit by Pharos to Zoom Video Communications incomprehensible. Even now, this article is feeble. But it might go somewhere. When its authors believe that the draft is better (for its subject area) than are articles that already exist, they can ask for a move to article space. -- Hoary (talk) 06:34, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Hoary: The reason I did this is precisely because much of the content in that section of Zoom Video Communications is not actually specific to Zoom, but applies to the whole teleconferencing industry during this time. That page should only have Zoom-specific info, and currently it has generic content on the whole industry simply because it is the most commonly-known brand name.--Pharos (talk) 18:35, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
Totally TV (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An impressive amount of subscribers, but there isn't coverage in reliable sources to match. Does not meet

WP:GNG, article creator appears to be a UPE creating articles about the channel's productions. signed, Rosguill talk 00:27, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. signed, Rosguill talk 00:27, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:32, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per GNG and NORG. This is the coverage I could find:
  • [46] has minor coverage of of the channel and its parent company.
  • [47] has minor coverage
  • [48] (from the article) also has minor coverage.
  • [49] has minor coverage.
  • [50] has trivial coverage.
Not enough to meet GNG; certainly not enough to meet NORG.
userdude 00:38, 1 April 2020 (UTC); struck duplicate entry 01:07, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 06:59, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pop Music High

Pop Music High (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet

WP:GNG, article creator appears to be a UPE creating hack job articles about Totally TV productions without even checking to make sure that the sources mention the subject. signed, Rosguill talk 00:18, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. signed, Rosguill talk 00:18, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. signed, Rosguill talk 00:18, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:45, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Super Pops

The Super Pops (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet

WP:GNG. The only provided source which is possibly reliable is some local news coverage focusing on an interview with a local who was cast in this show [51]. The rest of the provided coverage does not appear to be reliable, with a guest appearance from an article in Variety that does not mention the subject at all. The primary editor for the article appears to be a UPE editor, particularly considering that they made a COI disclosure on their user page which they subsequently removed signed, Rosguill talk 00:14, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. signed, Rosguill talk 00:14, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. signed, Rosguill talk 00:14, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The coverage I could find is:
  • [52] — local paper quoting one of the actors, Scarlet Sheppard, The content of the Totally TV Super Pops show is family friendly and fun
  • [53] — minor coverage, unclear if this source is reliable
  • [54] — minor coverage from local paper
  • [55] — trivial mention
The subject does not meet
userdude 05:58, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to

ess), at 21:53, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Pauline Wilson

Pauline Wilson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats
)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Delete or redirect to the band Seawind. Unsourced since 2009. Vmavanti (talk) 00:09, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the
userdude 00:15, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
Note: This discussion has been included in the
userdude 00:15, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
Note: This discussion has been included in the
userdude 00:15, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 21:39, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 06:59, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Institute of Rural Management (Pakistan)

Institute of Rural Management (Pakistan) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable organization, fails

WP:NORG. Störm (talk) 19:21, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:22, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:22, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MelanieN (talk) 00:08, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete While searches are complicated by the presence of other Institutes of Rural Management, this IRM does not appear to be notable. This appears to be the only source that is independent, significant, and reliable. That is not enough to pass
    WP:GNG. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 21:27, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 07:00, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

IDonate (Pakistan)

IDonate (Pakistan) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable organization, fails

WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 19:21, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:22, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:22, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note to closer for soft deletion: While this discussion appears to have
    talk) 21:26, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MelanieN (talk) 00:08, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per NORG. Could not find any sources about the subject. [56], from the article, appears to be a reliable source about iDonate; however, it alone is not enough for GNG or NORG.
    userdude 00:24, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 07:01, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Society for Sustainable Development

Society for Sustainable Development (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable organization, fails

WP:NORG. Störm (talk) 19:31, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:33, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:33, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MelanieN (talk) 00:05, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Unsourced since creation in 2015 and no
    WP:RS appear to exist (at least in English) to demonstrate notability. The only sources found on searches are to the organization's own web pages or to simple database entries and social media profiles demonstrating mere existence. No indication that there is any significant coverage of this organization or its activities in any RS. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 19:09, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:45, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Haq Home

Miss Haq Home (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable organization, fails

WP:NORG. Störm (talk) 19:32, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:34, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:34, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MelanieN (talk) 00:05, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Of the sources from the article:
  • [59] is an obituary that mentions Miss Haq Home once.
  • [60] appears to be an organization directly associated with Miss Haq Home
  • [61] (2011 archive) has no indication that it is a
    reliable source
  • [62] only mentions the Miss Haq Home once; may be associated with it
Of the sources I found:
  • [63] claims Miss Haq Home is a well-known institute and covers the subject, but it is a blog post.
I do not believe this is enough coverage to meet
userdude 06:07, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui 雲水 08:52, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mashal (organisation)

Mashal (organisation) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No coverage found. Fails

WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 19:41, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:43, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:43, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MelanieN (talk) 00:04, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Dunkin' Donuts#International. Sandstein 07:01, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dunkin' Donuts Israel

Dunkin' Donuts Israel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats
)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The company seems to be a none notable franchise of Dunkin' Donuts that was only around for a few years. Most of the sources come from a single website that appears to be a news blog. Them and the other sources are trivial coverage. All that said, I'd be fine with it being merged into the normal Dunkin' Donuts article as an alternative to deletion if it's notable enough to be merged. Adamant1 (talk) 09:49, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:52, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:52, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. North America1000 12:52, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MelanieN (talk) 00:01, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge this
    Dunkin Donuts#International per North America 1000. Havradim (talk) 20:47, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Merge with Dunkin' Donuts for reasons stated above. Nate 2169 Talk
    Contributions     20:58, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep--this is better developed than I thought it would be. Everyone knows that Jewish pastries are tasty--and the question of whether a multinational corporation can compete in such a competitive environment is a worthy one. Economists have noticed the reverse phenomenon with respect to tech companies and Japan--a Japanese tech company competitive in Japan is likely to do well internationally due to the the extreme competitive nature of Japan's economic situation. Some countries are worthy of special attention due to being a testing lab so-to-speak. A mere redirect would not do this question justice. I suppose other challenging markets for Dunkin Donuts would be the Czech Republic and France. I checked and it seems this page was created well over a decade after the Israel branch folded. It was created by User:Galatz, who has a banner on his page about how he observes the Sabbath. Why would he be interested in Dunkin Donuts failing in Israel? Well, if I was Czech and Dunkin Donuts failed in the Czech Republic I'd say its proof that my mother's kolaches are superior.--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 01:30, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with the above, but all of it fits well in the parent article. It is short already and can be condensed further. There is no need for a stand-alone for this, certainly not for a defunct organisation. Havradim (talk) 22:11, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I encourage you to spend some time on the Hebrew Wikipedia. Even on Google translate, you may find some interesting jokes worked into the articles. For example, the article on "Lutheranism" has a picture of a Lutheran church in Australia boasting a prominent Star of David. Maybe it just caught someone's eye as a non-sequitur, but it also seems to be insinuating that Lutherans are crypto-Jews! (Those parts of the Reformation about relying on the scripture and not having a pope, and the doctrine of Justification as being the doctrine on which the church stands and falls, ("the true Kabbalah" as mentioned briefly in On the Freedom of a Christian)...just where did Luther get those ideas from? Who was right there in Germany? Touche!) The English Wikipedia could use some Jewish insight and humor. Better than making the reader do Google translate on the Hebrew one.--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 02:58, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

April Fools' Day nominations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Failure to launch. Somehow this AfD was never successfully transcluded onto the logpage, and never closed properly. Oh well.

(non-admin closure) jp×g 03:22, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Boeing 737 MAX (2nd Nomination)

Boeing 737 MAX (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It got grounded. Let's ground it again! {{SUBST:replyto|Can I Log In}}PLEASE copy and paste the code to reply(Talk) 16:52, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Secede. April Fools! (non-admin closure) Koridas (Speak) 19:14, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Michigan

Michigan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm afraid Michigan and Ohio can no longer peacefully coexist on this platform, and, let's face it: Ohio's the better state anyway. Naturally, the choice is clear.--TZLNCTV (talk) 15:57, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Secede - Let it secede from here and let it create its own country. Michigan shall be independent. Koridas (Speak) 19:14, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep. April Fools AfD (non-admin closure) En2que (talk) 07:56, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Loot box

Loot box (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per

WP:IDONTLIKEIT. Tried to get rare stuff and got only the same useless items like 50 times each, wasting like 250$. Government regulation won't be enough, we need to completely get rid of them. En2que (talk) 08:25, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nice.

(non-admin closure) Pandakekok9 (talk) 03:42, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

69

69 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

nice. MadameButterflyKnife yeah sure.talk 00:23, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to

(non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 00:21, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

7

7 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One day, two threes were fourcasting the possibility of cannibalism in the span of five days. Six was found calling the emergency number reporting canabalistic behavior. "Seven ate nine!" cried 6. That same day, 7 went to church to ask for forgiveness for his sines. "I ate nine," he said while crying a ray of sorrow. The priest looked at 7, and said that "Yes, you do need to forgive yourself. Return to 6. Together, you will become the product we were all looking for. You'll see y." 7 skipped 14 blocks back home, as the priest told himself, "you can't trust primal numbers." 7 returned to 6, and asked him for forgiveness. "Sure," said 6. "That bloke, he's so square, I don't know what to do with him. I intended to take him out myself." 6 wasn't a religious guy, but 7 was the right angle he needed. Since then, 6 and 7 have ruled the domain for a long range of time. One Blue Hat❯❯❯ (talk) 16:16, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Wrong venue * Pppery * it has begun... 00:03, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:April Fools/April Fools' Day 2020

Wikipedia:April Fools/April Fools' Day 2020 (edit | [[Talk:Wikipedia:April Fools/April Fools' Day 2020|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This could be the end of an era for April Fools' XfDs. Thanks for over a decade of fun. —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 23:59, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Too late * Pppery * it has begun... 00:05, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2

April 2 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

QUICK DELETE ALL NON APRIL 1ST DAYS SO WE CAN KEEP THIS GOING! {{SUBST:replyto|Can I Log In}}PLEASE copy and paste the code to reply(Talk) 23:57, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Better act quickly.

UV}} 2604:2000:8FC0:4:68BA:3B32:8613:8B6D (talk) 23:59, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete.

(non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 00:20, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Democracy

Democracy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per

WP:NOTDEMOCRACY Spirit of Eagle (talk) 23:16, 1 April 2020 (UTC) [April Fools!][reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Keep it going...

ess), at 23:23, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Final Hour

Final Hour (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

We gotta keep April Fools' Day going! {{SUBST:replyto|Can I Log In}}PLEASE copy and paste the code to reply(Talk) 23:13, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Recurse.

(non-admin closure) -KAP03 (Talk • Contributions • Email) 01:03, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Recursion

AfDs for this article:
Recursion (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This should be redirected to Recursion.[4-1] -KAP03 (Talk • Contributions • Email) 21:21, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was April Fool's is over.

(non-admin closure) Aasim 01:08, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Pink cat

AfDs for this article:
Pink cat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

What's this? An article about many cats that happen to be the same color. I think this should be redirected to Uranus to avoid a disaster.[4-1]-KAP03 (Talk • Contributions • Email) 21:15, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was we lost it.

(non-admin closure) Aasim 01:08, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Sanity

Sanity (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

NPOV violation. We truly don't have standards, and this discriminates against Wikipedians on April 1st.One Blue Hat❯❯❯ (talk) 19:19, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. April Fool's is over

(non-admin closure) Aasim 01:09, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Hunger

Hunger (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am ending hunger Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 18:59, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. April Fool's is over

(non-admin closure) Aasim 01:09, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Holy Roman Empire

Holy Roman Empire (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Should be deleted because it is neither Holy,nor Roman,nor an Empire.[April Fools!] KaptaşHero (talk) 20:33, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Backlog emptied.

(non-admin closure) -KAP03 (Talk • Contributions • Email) 01:04, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Wikipedia:Backlog

Wikipedia:Backlog (edit | [[Talk:Wikipedia:Backlog|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I wonder why no one ever thought of this. To get rid of all of Wikipedia's problems, simply delete them. There can be no pain and suffering whilst trying to reduce the backlog if there simply is no backlog[April Fools!] Firestarforever (talk) 17:14, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. April Fools is over

(non-admin closure) -KAP03 (Talk • Contributions • Email) 02:10, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Terraria

Terraria (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Version 1.4, which was supposed to be released in 2019, STILL hasn't come out 25% of the way through 2020 Computerfan0 (talk) 17:37, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.


The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No more Comic Sans. April Fool's is over

(non-admin closure) Aasim 01:10, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Comic Sans

Comic Sans (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Do I need to explain this? One Blue Hat❯❯❯ (talk) 16:50, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. April Fool's is over

(non-admin closure) Aasim 01:11, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Bill Wurtz

Bill Wurtz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

He may or may not exist, as evidenced by if you ask him.[April Fools!] -insert valid name here- (talk) 17:16, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. April Fool's is over. Have this:

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.
(non-admin closure) Aasim 01:12, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Trout

Trout (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per

WP:TROUT. Oshawott 12 ==()== Talk to me! 14:57, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 16:21, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Please see

(non-admin closure) Aasim 01:12, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Special:RecentChanges

Special:RecentChanges (edit | [[Talk:Special:RecentChanges|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It's April Fools' Day, so it's okay to let the vandals slide. Right? Wrong. Subject to Wikipedia Policies and Guidelines. {{SUBST:replyto|Can I Log In}}PLEASE copy and paste the code to reply(Talk) 16:28, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Renamed. to

(non-admin closure) –Davey2010Talk 00:47, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

April 1

AfDs for this article:
April 1 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete as it should really be called March 32.[4-1] -KAP03 (Talk • Contributions • Email) 16:15, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Object that it's REALLY more of a January 90 (or January 91st in a leap year) Gimubrc (talk) 16:17, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Rollback: Get someone with Huggle to do it. Twinkle can't do it. {{SUBST:replyto|Can I Log In}}PLEASE copy and paste the code to reply(Talk) 16:19, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was get out of quarantine.

(non-admin closure) Aasim 01:57, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Homestuck

Homestuck (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It isn't canon anymore. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 15:36, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete We're all stuck at home, and
    I DON'T LIKE IT. Margalob (talk) 22:57, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Rick rolled.

(non-admin closure) Aasim 01:53, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Rick Astley

Rick Astley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not nessisary to have. Alway telling lies. Always Hurting me and deserting me. Jcoolbro (talk) 15:10, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - I am tired of being rickrolled by everyone. Time to teach them a lesson. Koridas (Speak) 16:21, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Rick Rollback: It's for the first time in 2020. {{SUBST:replyto|Can I Log In}}PLEASE copy and paste the code to reply(Talk) 16:25, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was it died..

(non-admin closure) Aasim 01:53, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Windows 10 Mobile


Windows 10 Mobile (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nobody uses it [April Fools!]Computerfan0 (talk) 14:38, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. April Fools is over

(non-admin closure) -KAP03 (Talk • Contributions • Email) 01:47, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Truth

Truth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · [64])
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia:Verifiability, not truth. This article contradicts one of Wikipedia's basic premises, and we can't even be sure of its truth value.[April Fools!] ComplexRational (talk) 14:16, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was too slow to delete, so I keep it for

(non-admin closure) 7 successful entries. 5 failed. Not very great at jokes (#GenUnstoppableFoolery) 00:49, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Sonic hedgehog

talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats
)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Gotta go fast! Collect the protein rings! We must stop Dr. Proteinman! AlexKiddo16 (talk) 12:40, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was this AfD was imaginary. (non-admin closure) {{SUBST:replyto|Can I Log In}}PLEASE copy and paste the code to reply(Talk) 00:30, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Imaginary number

Imaginary number (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There's no such thing as an imaginary number. It's not real.[April Fools!]--AlphaBeta135 (talk) 12:30, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You be rat√-1onal. And get on my plane of existence. Or should I say tesseract, because I am actually 4D?
talk) 20:22, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to

(non-admin closure) Mdaniels5757 (talk) 02:13, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Darth Plagueis

Darth Plagueis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It's not a story the Jedi would tell you.[April Fools!]JOEBRO64 11:42, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was April Fool's is over.

(non-admin closure) Aasim 02:01, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Wikipedia:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man

AfDs for this article:
Wikipedia:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man (edit | [[Talk:Wikipedia:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · for deletion/Wikipedia:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fuck you, I do what I want. [April Fools!] MorphinBrony (talk) 06:22, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.

(non-admin closure) Aasim 02:01, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

WhatsApp

WhatsApp (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I made a conversation, and found out WhatsApp is useless. Texted my grandpa, and he said just "Moo"! AlexKiddo16 (talk) 06:38, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[April Fools!][reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete per

(non-admin closure) Aasim 01:59, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Crystal ball

AfDs for this article:
Crystal ball (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete per

WP:NOTCRYSTALBALL. -KAP03 (Talk • Contributions • Email) 05:51, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

  • Delete per nom. Aasim 07:43, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - NOTCRYSTALBALL says we should delete because we aren't one...but this article actually is, thus clearly it's the exception that proves the fool. Nosebagbear (talk) 09:31, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. - ZLEA (talk) 23:57, 1 April 1920 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was

(non-admin closure) 7 successful entries. 5 failed. Not very great at jokes (#GenUnstoppableFoolery) 01:35, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Scientology

Scientology (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

My son is in the Super-Movementarian cult! Help him out! --Marge Simpson 05:44, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • No opinion (leaning keep) because Scientology is reading this discussion. Renerpho (talk) 09:39, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Definite opinion (leaning destroy with thunderbolt) because all of Mount Olympus is reading this discussion. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:01, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. April Fools is over

(non-admin closure) -KAP03 (Talk • Contributions • Email) 01:48, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Milli Vanilli

Milli Vanilli (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – (View MfD)

They never really existed Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 05:36, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep because Girl you know it's--girl you know it's--girl you know it's--girl you know it's.
  • Banish to
    Bowser's castle and force them to play music for Wendy. Punishment for lip-syncing, especially with a princess
    in the audience.
  • SPEEDY DELETE - Per
    WP:COPYVIO. Lip-syncing is not an excuse. Koridas (Speak) 16:11, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was missing from some maps.

(non-admin closure) 7 successful entries. 5 failed. Not very great at jokes (#GenUnstoppableFoolery) 01:37, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

New Zealand

New Zealand (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Aotearoa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No! One! Will! Find! Where! The! Hobbits! Or! Jacinda! Lives! (Gallifrey is a place on Earth - it's name is Aotearoa/New Zealand) --#ChairmanXiFoolery #GenHongKongProtestersFoolery (#GenUnstoppableFoolery) 05:13, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Wrong venue.

(non-admin closure) Aasim 02:02, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion


Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (edit | [[Talk:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apparently it was the wrong venue! {{SUBST:replyto|Can I Log In}}PLEASE copy and paste the code to reply(Talk) 03:35, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Wrong venue.

(non-admin closure) Aasim 02:02, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (edit | [[Talk:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This should've never existed! {{SUBST:replyto|Can I Log In}}PLEASE copy and paste the code to reply(Talk) 03:24, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was the Earth being blown up because some people on the internet said so.

(non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 00:23, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Earth

Earth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete to make a inter-wiki bypass. [4-1]-KAP03 (Talk • Contributions • Email) 03:17, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy Delete. because I don't like circles

(non-admin closure) –Davey2010Talk 00:52, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Circle

AfDs for this article:
Circle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This should be deleted per

WP:CIRCULAR.-KAP03 (Talk • Contributions • Email) 02:56, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete all shapes from existence. The square and all other shapes with points are too
talk) 20:20, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. 4-1 is over

Message) 01:55, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

The Quintessential Quintuplets

The Quintessential Quintuplets (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · [65])
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm still upset about Ichika losing... let's just delete this from our collective memories. [

csdnew 02:22, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was the dubber takes it all.

(non-admin closure) 7 successful entries. 5 failed. Not very great at jokes (#GenUnstoppableFoolery) 01:29, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Nana Mizuki

Nana Mizuki (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Kana Hanazawa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Rie Kugimiya (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

"A noble series embiggens the smallest Anglo-dubber."

For too long, we have been fight over subbing or dubbing on animated series of Non-English speaking countries origin, and now the dubbers will end the argue:

We will delete articles of these voice actresses/singer/whatever to protect the rights of our humble Anglo-Dubbers, such as Castellaneta, MacFarlane, Edgerly, Azaria, Kavner, Cartwright, Buckland, Herington and many others.

(oops, I forgot Stupid Ned Flanders and Lisa Simpson. D'oh!) --#ChairmanXiFoolery #GenHongKongProtestersFoolery (#GenUnstoppableFoolery) 02:17, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep and trout the nominator. Seiyuu > English dub actors.
    csdnew 02:20, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Meow.

(non-admin closure) -KAP03 (Talk • Contributions • Email) 01:05, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Kitten

Kitten (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Cuteness does not equate to notability.[April Fools!] Coolabahapple (talk) 01:41, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Meeoowww! meow, meow, meow, meow, meow." "Mitskie! Get off my computer!" Coolabahapple (talk) 02:30, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"ROWWRR!! meow, meow" "and stop playing with the mouse!" Coolabahapple (talk) 22:17, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was

(non-admin closure) 7 successful entries. 5 failed. Not very great at jokes (#GenUnstoppableFoolery) 01:30, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Haruhi Suzumiya

Haruhi Suzumiya (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Yuki Nagato (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views
)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

What a rip off. The alien doesn't regenerate and doesn't talk a lot. Better hit the play button... (Plays Doctor Who theme) --#ChairmanXiFoolery #GenHongKongProtestersFoolery (#GenUnstoppableFoolery) 01:59, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - As a follower of Haruhiism I find this nomination to be blasphemy and heretical.
    csdnew 02:14, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was I closed it because you didn't

(non-admin closure) 7 successful entries. 5 failed. Not very great at jokes (#GenUnstoppableFoolery) 01:24, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Arsenal F.C.

Arsenal F.C. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Houston Rockets (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

They are supporting China's separatism, which means they hate my county! -- Sun Yang 01:52, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was the war ended.

(non-admin closure) epicgenius (talk) 22:01, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Anglo-Zanzibar War

Anglo-Zanzibar War (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · War Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only 38 to 45 minutes long. My dinner takes longer than that, but we don't have a page titled "Epicgenius's dinner".[April Fools!] epicgenius (talk) 01:45, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. April Fools is over

(non-admin closure) -KAP03 (Talk • Contributions • Email) 01:51, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Nickelback

Nickelback (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

LOOK AT THIS PHOTOGRAPH. EVERY TIME I DO IT MAKES ME LAUGH! Delete per

WP:GARAGE. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:40, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

(talk) 14:20, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per No one cares about your garage band. ⌚️ (talk) 21:02, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was April Fools or redirect to somewhere, no one knows where.

ess), at 00:01, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Pizza Hut

Pizza Hut (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Domino's is so much better. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:36, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was April Fools.

ess), at 00:02, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Michael Bloomberg

Michael Bloomberg (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Pete Buttigieg (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Amy Klobuchar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Elizabeth Warren (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Why these candidates have to drop out during Super Tuesday? WHY!!! Plus - why this one's dropping too late?

Tulsi Gabbard (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All these candidate pages should merge with Joe Biden's:

Michael Bloomberg 2020 presidential campaign (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Pete Buttigieg 2020 presidential campaign (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Amy Klobuchar 2020 presidential campaign (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Elizabeth Warren 2020 presidential campaign (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

-- No 3rd turns, vote 4 Burns #ChairmanXiFoolery #GenHongKongProtestersFoolery (#GenUnstoppableFoolery) 01:31, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Pang.

ess), at 00:02, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Ping

View AfD · Stats
)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Pong! Ping! Pong! Ping! Pong! Ping! (Pong!) 01:14, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was April Fools.

ess), at 00:02, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

XFL (2020)

talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · [66]
)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

What's this? No scramble for the ball? No Jesse Ventura as commentator? No cheerleaders? No He Hate Me? No XTREME team names? This is NOT the XFL, it's just some lame and toned-down imitation that fails miserably at being it. It must be deleted so that the XFL name not be tainted. [

csdnew
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to

ess), at 00:04, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Airbus A380

Airbus A380 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · [67])
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It has sadly been proven that the plane is too big and too expensive to be operated economically. And now with Airbus announcing that production of the plane will end next year, it is perhaps but appropriate that we ground our article on our favorite gentle giant for similar reasons. [

csdnew 01:13, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect all to

ess), at 00:04, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Square

Square (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This should be deleted as it is

WP:POINTY [4-1]-KAP03 (Talk • Contributions • Email) 01:12, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Point (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Triangle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Rectangle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Pentagon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Hexagon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Octagon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Decagon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Dodecagon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Delete all shapes from existence. The square and all other shapes with points are too
talk
) 20:18, 1 April 2020 (UTC
Merge Antiquated model to
New Square, the parent article and other antiquated model. StonyBrook (talk) 21:29, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

[April Fools!]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was April Fools. Conspiracies can come true...

ess), at 00:05, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Finland (2nd nomination)

Finland (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It's all fake, Have you seen the facts? Wake UP! Yes, That Will (talk) 01:05, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was April Fools.

ess), at 00:06, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Madden NFL 08

Madden NFL 08 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

People need to realize there's only one sports game that deserves recognition! I'll show them! I'll show them all! Most Horizontal Primate (talk) 01:05, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is probably the last place I'd expect a Scott the Woz reference, but I'm not complaining. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cortex128 (talk • contribs) 04:25, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply] 

~~
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was April Fools.

ess), at 00:06, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

List of star systems within 20–25 light-years

List of star systems within 20–25 light-years (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Hopelessly

WP:POV title implicitly assumes the sol system is the only place anybody would be interested in measuring distance from. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:04, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was MISSEDTHEJO.

ess), at 00:07, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Space Launch System

Space Launch System (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A complete and utter waste of time and money. Just bin it or merge it to

csdnew 01:04, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was MISSEDTHEJO.

ess
), at 00:07, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

Actually, it is IMISSEDTHEJOKE. --Soumyabrata stay at home wash your hands to protect from coronavirus 09:47, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect ... somewhere.

ess), at 00:08, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Uranus

AfDs for this article:
Uranus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

For the past few years, people have been !voting Redirect to Uranus on various April Fools' AfDs. As such, this joke has been run into the ground. The only logical remedy is to delete the would-be redirect target. —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 01:01, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Redirect to Uranus. That is the obvious solution to the problem.
However if that is not suitable for you, I would consider redirecting to Neptune or Saturn.-KAP03 (Talk • Contributions • Email) 01:05, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was on. Underrated word in this discussion.

ess), at 00:09, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Wheel

View AfD · Stats
)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

So Willy doesn't have any to be on. Linguist111talk 01:00, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.


The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nominate at FfD. Duh.

ess), at 00:09, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 April 1

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 April 1 (edit | [[Talk:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 April 1|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Totally unnecessary page, probably should be redirected to the Main Page-KAP03 (Talk • Contributions • Email) 00:56, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was happiness.

ess), at 00:09, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Evil

Evil (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Don't be evil, be a hippie

Did you hear that Barnacle Boy? There's evil afoot! We must get in the Invisible Boatmobile and defeat the EVIIIIIIIIIIIIL! Mermaid Man and Barnacle Boy Unite! Mermaid Man (talk) 00:53, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Convicted, pending sysopping, and pending disqualification. (non-admin closure) {{SUBST:replyto|Can I Log In}}PLEASE copy and paste the code to reply(Talk) 00:24, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for de-adminship/Can I Log In

Wikipedia:Requests for de-adminship/Can I Log In (edit | [[Talk:Wikipedia:Requests for de-adminship/Can I Log In|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · for de-adminship/Can I Log In Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Do not delete this page. I meant to put this at Articles for Creation, but it turned out it got redirected. So please participate at RfDA. {{SUBST:replyto|Can I Log In}}PLEASE copy and paste the code to reply(Talk) 00:44, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was April Fool's is over.

(non-admin closure) Aasim 02:03, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

BanG Dream!

BanG Dream! (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As a loyal and dedicated Love Live! fan, it sickens me that this upstart franchise is stealing our beloved franchise's fans. We must delete the BanG Dream! menace from existence and return Love Live! to its rightful place at the top of the idol franchise food chain. Kasumi and Lisa still best girls though. [

csdnew 00:43, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Restock.

(non-admin closure) -KAP03 (Talk • Contributions • Email) 01:10, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Nintendo Switch

Nintendo Switch (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It's always out of stock, therefore Wikipedia should do the same and not list the article until there's new stock. Either that or we temporarily redirect our potential shoppers to

csdnew 00:40, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Smash - Smash the article. Koridas (Speak) 00:43, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - The smash must be performed by
talk) 19:55, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
Comment - Alternatively, Hulk can perform it since his other name is
talk) 20:03, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
Restock ANNNNNND THEY'RE GONE! Better luck next time! Yes, That Will (talk) 01:21, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Restock ANNNNNND THEY'RE GONE! Better luck next time! ◢   Ganbaruby!   (Say hi!) 05:12, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Restock - Third time lucky? Nope, THEY'RE GONE! Better luck next time! Foxnpichu (talk) 17:41, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hack using CVE-2018-6242 - Give the patched consoles to the n00bs that don't care.
talk) 19:55, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
Don't restock, leave the article, but add a redirect to Wii U
talk) 19:55, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

References

  1. ^ "Space Hulk for Wii U - Nintendo Game Details". www.nintendo.com. Retrieved 2020-04-01.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was April Fool's is over.

(non-admin closure) Aasim 02:08, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Stanley Kubrick

Stanley Kubrick (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Time to settle the infobox issue once and for all. Anyone seeking information on Kubrick can just look elsewhere on the internet.[April Fools!] Ionmars10 (talk) 00:42, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Move to somewhere.

(non-admin closure) -KAP03 (Talk • Contributions • Email) 01:11, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Flybe

Flybe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Flybe is FlyMaybe no more as they're done. Now let's clip its article of its wings too. Nominating the following articles for the same reason:

Air Italy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
AtlasGlobal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

[

csdnew 00:35, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Il n’y a pas de consensus.

(non-admin closure) Aasim 21:33, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

French language

AfDs for this article:
    • Articles for deletion/French language
French language (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ce 1 avril je vais vous frapper tous avec un

truite mouillés jusqu'à midi. Linguist111talk
00:25, 1 avril 2020 (UTC)

  • Non merci, et je vais vous expliquer pourquoi:

essais
), at 00:35, 1 avril 2020 (UTC)

  • Poisson d'avril.
whacked with a wet trout
.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something silly.

parler
 00:42, 1 avril 2020 (UTC)
  • Le Québec est la seule vraie langue de Wikipédia. N'oppressons pas la belle langue québécoise! génieépique (discuter) 1 avril 2020 à 03:04 (CEST)
  • Supprimer, j’ai dû utiliser un traducteur pour écrire cela de sorte qu’il est
    évidemment composé. (Translated with Bing) Aasim 07:26, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Merge to Latin as a POV fork. And what's all this gibberish above me? — Bilorv (talk) 11:05, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Move to
    Périphérique. TigraanClick here to contact me 12:53, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to

(non-admin closure) Mdaniels5757 (talk) 02:05, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Sakura Kinomoto

Sakura Kinomoto (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It's Sakura's birthday today! Happy Birthday Sakura! Let's celebrate by deleting her article!

Also including the following pages:
Cardcaptor Sakura (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Tsubasa: Reservoir Chronicle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

[

csdnew 00:20, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Rest in Peace Kobe Bryant. April Fool's is over

(non-admin closure) Aasim 01:45, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Calabasas, California

Calabasas, California (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Also nominating the following article:
Sikorsky S-76 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
csdnew 00:13, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was

(non-admin closure) Aasim 02:10, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

2019–20 NBA season

2019–20 NBA season (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm still upset that my beloved Warriors won't be able to avenge their heartbreaking loss to the Raptors last season... Let's just quarantine this season and forget it all happened. [

csdnew 00:08, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was time's arrow flies relentlessly. As the Wikipedians screeched, looking to banish the horrible year, the year continued on its inexorable path, bringing us all one step closer to oblivion. ~ mazca talk 01:23, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2020

2020 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · [69])
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It's only April and this year has already been a disaster. Let's delete this entire year and pretend it never happened. Social distancing necessary too. [

csdnew 00:03, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

TRASH CAN BANISHMENT Awful year, ban who ever did this — Preceding unsigned comment added by Homeofthething (talk • contribs) 01:51, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply] 

 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Computerfan0 (talk • contribs) 14:55, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Throw into pond
whacked with a hover of wet trouts
.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you and some others did something silly.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Citation needed [

(non-admin closure) Aasim 21:30, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Template:citation needed

AfDs for this article:
    Template:citation needed (edit | [[Talk:Template:citation needed|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    Totally unnecessary template. [citation needed][4-1] -KAP03 (Talk • Contributions • Email) 00:07, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
    talk page or in a deletion review
    ). No further edits should be made to this page.


    The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
    talk page or in a deletion review
    ). No further edits should be made to this page.

    The result was SLAP.

    You've been whacked with a WikiMinnow..

    Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you might have done something silly.

    (non-admin closure) Aasim 21:28, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
    ]

    George S. Patton slapping incidents

    George S. Patton slapping incidents (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    SLAP SLAP SLAP SLAP. SLAP SLAP SLAP SLAP SLAP SLAP SLAP (SLAP) 00:05, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    This page has been BOMBED!! KABOOM!
    SLAP SLAP SLAP SLAP SLAP SLAP. SLAP (SLAP) 00:18, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Whack!

    You've been whacked with a wet trout.

    Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.
    csdnew 01:32, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
    ]
    • WHACK Homeofthething (talk) 14:27, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • Speedy delete this page as the article it refers to contains extreme violence. Meanwhile I had my user page reverted, despite it only containing references to
      Edward Khil
      . Actually, on second thought, I believe the name of a deceased singer was disrespectful, but still. I didn't even get a proper explanation. 17:16, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
    whacked with a hover of wet trouts
    .

    Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you and some others did something silly.
    • SLAP SLAP SLAP SLAP SLAP SLAP SLAP SLAP SLAP SLAP. SLAP SLAP SLAP SLAP SLAP SLAP SLAP SLAP SLAP. SLAP SLAP SLAP SLAP SLAP SLAP SLAP SLAP SLAP. SLAP (SLAP) 18:10, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
    talk page or in a deletion review
    ). No further edits should be made to this page.
    The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
    talk page or in a deletion review
    ). No further edits should be made to this page.

    The result was Delete.

    (non-admin closure) Aasim 01:45, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
    ]

    South Park

    South Park (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    I don't like the show. There is way too much cursing and offensive jokes. [April Fools!] Koridas (Speak) 23:59, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
    talk page or in a deletion review
    ). No further edits should be made to this page.
    The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
    talk page or in a deletion review
    ). No further edits should be made to this page.

    The result was Cancelled.

    (non-admin closure) Aasim 01:46, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
    ]

    E3 2020

    E3 2020 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    The event is cancelled, therefore it is also in our best interest to also cancel our article about this now non-existent event. [

    csdnew 00:00, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
    ]

    The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
    talk page or in a deletion review
    ). No further edits should be made to this page.


    The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
    talk page or in a deletion review
    ). No further edits should be made to this page.

    The result was Ask

    (non-admin closure) Aasim 21:25, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
    ]

    Thanos

    Thanos (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    And I am, Iron Man. SuperXpert (talk) 16:06, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Comment @
    WP:FOOTY articles should be deleted in part of that half. Glaceon (talk) 00:39, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
    ]
    The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
    talk page or in a deletion review
    ). No further edits should be made to this page.
    The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
    talk page or in a deletion review
    ). No further edits should be made to this page.

    The result was too late to keep.

    (non-admin closure) 7 successful entries. 5 failed. Not very great at jokes (#GenUnstoppableFoolery) 01:28, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
    ]

    2020 Summer Olympics

    2020 Summer Olympics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
    UEFA Euro 2020 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    Totally too soon. (Am I too early to nominate for April Fools?) --#ChairmanXiFoolery #GenHongKongProtestersFoolery (#GenUnstoppableFoolery) 10:51, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply
    ]

    The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
    talk page or in a deletion review
    ). No further edits should be made to this page.
    The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
    talk page or in a deletion review
    ). No further edits should be made to this page.

    The result was it's an Encyclopedia. (non-admin closure) {{SUBST:replyto|Can I Log In}}PLEASE copy and paste the code to reply(Talk) 00:53, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    The Entirety of Wikipedia

    AfDs for this article:
    Special:AllPages (edit | [[Talk:Special:AllPages|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    Unreliable, tertiary source. Delete as per

    WP:NOTSOURCE. dibbydib Ping me! 💬/✏ 23:29, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply
    ]

    The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
    talk page or in a deletion review
    ). No further edits should be made to this page.

    The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
    talk page or in a deletion review
    ). No further edits should be made to this page.

    The result was unpersoned.

    (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 00:24, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
    ]

    Emmanuel Goldstein

    Emmanuel Goldstein (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    Per

    WP:INGSOC. rectify crimethink doublespeedwise. Upsidedown Keyboard (talk) 00:01, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
    ]

    The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
    talk page or in a deletion review
    ). No further edits should be made to this page.
    The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
    talk page or in a deletion review
    ). No further edits should be made to this page.

    The result was Ask the elder.

    Message) 06:47, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
    ]

    You

    You (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    You are unhealthy for the environment! Do the earth a favor, join the Voluntary Human Extinction Movement and nominate yourself for deletion today! VHEMT (talk) 00:15, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    1. ^ https://www.metrolyrics.com/crank-dat-soulja-boy-lyrics-soulja-boy.html
    The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
    talk page or in a deletion review
    ). No further edits should be made to this page.


    The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
    talk page or in a deletion review
    ). No further edits should be made to this page.

    The result was redirect to

    (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 00:23, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
    ]

    List of Pokémon

    List of Pokémon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    Way too many, there should only be eight Pokemon which should be Eevee and his evolutions. Glaceon (talk) 00:22, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
    talk page or in a deletion review
    ). No further edits should be made to this page.
    The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
    talk page or in a deletion review
    ). No further edits should be made to this page.

    The result was speedy delete as planned out

    (non-admin closure) Aasim 01:24, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
    ]

    Template:db

    AfDs for this article:
      Template:db (edit | [[Talk:Template:db|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
      (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

      This page needs to be speedy deleted per

      WP:CSD Aasim 01:07, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
      ]

      The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
      talk page or in a deletion review
      ). No further edits should be made to this page.
      The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
      talk page or in a deletion review
      ). No further edits should be made to this page.

      The result was Wrong venue.

      (non-admin closure) Aasim 01:47, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
      ]

      Wikipedia:Cabals

      Wikipedia:Cabals (edit | [[Talk:Wikipedia:Cabals|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
      (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

      This page should be deleted as

      There Is No Cabal. All hail Armok (talk) 01:18, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
      ]

      The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
      talk page or in a deletion review
      ). No further edits should be made to this page.
      The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
      talk page or in a deletion review
      ). No further edits should be made to this page.

      The result was Ask

      (non-admin closure) Aasim 01:46, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
      ]

      Wikipedia administrators

      Wikipedia administrators (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
      (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

      Let's get rid of all Wikipedia administrators![April Fools!] GZWDer (talk) 02:18, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

      MegaGoat this is the best song ever]. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 14:15, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      CAPTAIN MEDUSA, you have spawned a war -MegaGoat Contribs | April Fools Day 🤡 14:21, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      MegaGoat hands down this is the best. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 15:18, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      CAPTAIN MEDUSA now i am certain this will never end -MegaGoat Contribs | April Fools Day 🤡 15:39, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      MegaGoat, nope it will never end ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 15:41, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      CAPTAIN MEDUSA our work is never overrr -MegaGoat Contribs | April Fools Day 🤡 15:45, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      MegaGoat, nope never. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 15:55, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      CAPTAIN MEDUSA this is getting out of hand -MegaGoat Contribs | April Fools Day 🤡 16:01, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      MegaGoat, it's time to stop. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 16:07, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      Okay CAPTAIN MEDUSA -MegaGoat Contribs | April Fools Day 🤡 16:11, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      • Speedy delete, they reverted my user page to pre-April Fools without warning (I believe it is to do with naming a brand of beer or naming a deceased singer, can't tell which.) Computerfan0 (talk) 17:25, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      • Revenge delete. Payback time! Foxnpichu (talk) 17:54, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      • Oppose I consider this a declaration of war. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 18:57, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      • Send to the Croatian WP. Have a good time!--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 23:57, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
      talk page or in a deletion review
      ). No further edits should be made to this page.
      The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
      talk page or in a deletion review
      ). No further edits should be made to this page.

      The result was speedy keep. April Fools is over

      (non-admin closure) -KAP03 (Talk • Contributions • Email) 02:11, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
      ]

      Animal Crossing: New Horizons

      Animal Crossing: New Horizons (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
      (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

      During social distancing time against COVID-19, I love this game because of these cute thang, but we'd better focus on eradication of the virus due to the ongoing COVID-19 event[April Fools!]--TILRs (talk) 05:28, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

      The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
      talk page or in a deletion review
      ). No further edits should be made to this page.
      The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
      talk page or in a deletion review
      ). No further edits should be made to this page.

      The result was this was a fake AfD nomination. (non-admin closure) {{SUBST:replyto|Can I Log In}}PLEASE copy and paste the code to reply(Talk) 00:56, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

      Fake news

      Fake news (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
      (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL HOW CAN WE FND SOURCES WHEN THE NEWS ARE
      WP:FAKE
      ???)

      Because it is fake!

      WP:FAKE Jake The Great! | 📞 talk 05:48, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
      ]

      The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
      talk page or in a deletion review
      ). No further edits should be made to this page.
      The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
      talk page or in a deletion review
      ). No further edits should be made to this page.

      The result was No hay consenso.

      (non-admin closure) Aasim 01:14, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
      ]

      Español

      View AfD · Stats
      )
      (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

      No puedo a hablar español.

      Wikipedia no es para cosas hechas un día.[4-1] Aasim 07:13, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
      ]

      The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
      talk page or in a deletion review
      ). No further edits should be made to this page.
      The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
      talk page or in a deletion review
      ). No further edits should be made to this page.

      The result was Trouted.

      (non-admin closure) Aasim 01:15, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
      ]

      Wikipedia:Whacking with a wet trout

      Wikipedia:Whacking with a wet trout (edit | [[Talk:Wikipedia:Whacking with a wet trout|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
      (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

      I think we need to {{trout}} the creators of that page.[April Fools!] Aasim 07:21, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

      While I am at it:

      Whack!

      You've been whacked with a wet trout.

      Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.
      Aasim 07:22, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
      talk page or in a deletion review
      ). No further edits should be made to this page.
      The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
      talk page or in a deletion review
      ). No further edits should be made to this page.

      The result was Fire.

      (non-admin closure) Mdaniels5757 (talk) 02:07, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
      ]

      Berlin Brandenburg Airport

      Berlin Brandenburg Airport (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
      (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

      Because it is cheaper to tear it down and build it from scratch.[70][April Fools!] Renerpho (talk) 08:34, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

      The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
      talk page or in a deletion review
      ). No further edits should be made to this page.
      The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
      talk page or in a deletion review
      ). No further edits should be made to this page.

      The result was involved snow set index-ify.

      ess), at 00:11, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
      ]

      《ARTICLENAME》

      《ARTICLENAME》 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
      (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

      No reason at all

      Message) 09:37, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
      ]

      The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
      talk page or in a deletion review
      ). No further edits should be made to this page.
      The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
      talk page or in a deletion review
      ). No further edits should be made to this page.

      The result was speedy keep. April Fools is over

      (non-admin closure) -KAP03 (Talk • Contributions • Email) 02:11, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
      ]

      Lutetium

      Lutetium (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
      (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

      Delete because of the lack of applications for it and because it is too similar to the other lanthanides. [April Fools!] KaptaşHero (talk) 10:07, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

      The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
      talk page or in a deletion review
      ). No further edits should be made to this page.


      The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
      talk page or in a deletion review
      ). No further edits should be made to this page.

      The result was Delete the Deletion DIscussion which would Delete the Deletion DIscussion which would Delete the Deletion DIscussion which would Delete the Deletion DIscussion which would Delete the Deletion DIscussion. (non-admin closure) {{SUBST:replyto|Can I Log In}}PLEASE copy and paste the code to reply(Talk) 01:19, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

      Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion

      Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (edit | [[Talk:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
      (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

      Let's push the recursion.

      Message) 10:01, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
      ]

      • Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly
        Talk to my owner:Online 10:17, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
        ]
      • Wrong venue * Pppery * it has begun... 14:10, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      • Delete Unfortunately there has been a deletion of the creation of the deletion of the creation of the deletion of the creation of the deletion of the creation of the deletion of the creation of the deletion of the creation of the deletion of the creation of the deletion of the creation of the deletion of the creation of the deletion of the creation of the deletion. But I vote delete because of how nonsensical it is. Koridas (Speak) 15:07, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      • Delete like it never happened. on a side note, this joke is getting a bit stale, so... maybe don't go any deeper than this? Aasim 17:01, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
      talk page or in a deletion review
      ). No further edits should be made to this page.
      The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
      talk page or in a deletion review
      ). No further edits should be made to this page.

      The result was no consensus. April Fool's is over

      (non-admin closure) Aasim 01:22, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
      ]

      Bielefeld

      Bielefeld (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
      (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

      I believe this is Wikipedia's longest-standing hoax. Bielefeld is

      simply not real. — Bilorv (talk) 10:55, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
      ]

      The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
      talk page or in a deletion review
      ). No further edits should be made to this page.
      The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
      talk page or in a deletion review
      ). No further edits should be made to this page.

      The result was No more war.

      (non-admin closure) Aasim 01:16, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
      ]

      War


      War (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
      (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

      Should be deleted per

      WP:PEACE and the Preamble to the United Nations Charter.[April Fools!] KaptaşHero (talk) 12:58, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
      ]

      The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
      talk page or in a deletion review
      ). No further edits should be made to this page.
      The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
      talk page or in a deletion review
      ). No further edits should be made to this page.

      The result was April Fool's is over.

      (non-admin closure) Aasim 01:48, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
      ]

      Children

      talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats
      )
      (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

      So that people can stop saying "Think of the children![April Fools!] Jeb3Talk at me hereWhat I've Done 12:17, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

      The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
      talk page or in a deletion review
      ). No further edits should be made to this page.
      The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
      talk page or in a deletion review
      ). No further edits should be made to this page.

      The result was April Fool's is over.

      (non-admin closure) Aasim 01:47, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
      ]

      Log

      AfDs for this article:
      Log (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
      (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

      Why are logs important? Delete.

      talk 16:17, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
      ]

      talk | history | links | watch | logs | views
      )
      Oh yeah, there's this stupid non-deletion nomination page in the way of putting this in the correct place. Might as well delete that.
      talk 16:18, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
      ]
      Redirect to ln, we do not want any more trees cut down before earth day! Aasim 16:28, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      • Raise all by the power of their base to remove all of them. Problem solved! -KAP03 (Talk • Contributions • Email) 16:34, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
        • You are on the way to destruction per WP:NCR. Gimubrc (talk) 18:28, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      • I'm gonna huff, and I'm gonna puff, and I'm gonna blow this whole exponential house down! epicgenius (talk) 19:10, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
      talk page or in a deletion review
      ). No further edits should be made to this page.
      The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
      talk page or in a deletion review
      ). No further edits should be made to this page.

      The result was

      (non-admin closure) Aasim 01:18, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
      ]

      Windows

      Windows (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats
      )
      (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

      My mom uses macOS.[4-1] Aasim 16:54, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

      The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
      talk page or in a deletion review
      ). No further edits should be made to this page.
      The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
      talk page or in a deletion review
      ). No further edits should be made to this page.

      The result was

      (non-admin closure) Aasim 01:18, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
      ]

      macOS

      MacOS (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
      (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

      I use

      Windows.[4-1] Aasim 16:56, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
      ]

      The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
      talk page or in a deletion review
      ). No further edits should be made to this page.
      The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
      talk page or in a deletion review
      ). No further edits should be made to this page.

      The result was No more Captain Marvel. April Fool's is over

      (non-admin closure) Aasim 01:20, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
      ]

      Captain Marvel (2019 film)

      talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats
      )
      (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

      Per

      WP:IDONTLIKEIT. [April Fools!] MorphinBrony (talk) 21:44, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
      ]

      The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
      talk page or in a deletion review
      ). No further edits should be made to this page.
      Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Log/2020_April_1&oldid=1099686246"