Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lolifox 2nd attempt
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 02:24, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply
]
Lolifox
A fork of
WP:RS. The result of a previous AFD was to delete, but there is no evidence that this is a re-creation rather than a new article under the same title, so marking for speedy deletion is probably inappropriate. NOTE: If the consensus is to delete, then the corresponding fair-use image should also be deleted by the closing admin. Crotalus horridus (TALK • CONTRIBS) 18:18, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply
]
- Delete as ]
- Maybe you're right, but lolifox is still a legitimate branch of Firefox. Altmit Development is a real company/sole proprietorship, currently designing AGE (Altimit Game Engine) and DesktopIconStyle as well as lolifox. If Altimit really is creating their own software, then their other products might be added to Wikipedia as well...
Primetech 17:44, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable. It's not even worth a merge to the main Firefox article. YechielMan 14:55, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- delete. . Mukadderat 17:49, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.