Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lonnie Coffman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eagles 24/7 (C) 23:20, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lonnie Coffman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Note: This discussion has been included in the

π, ν) 00:24, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

• Delete Fails
  talk 00:52, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete per nom, no reason every person who was at the Capitol needs an article. JayJay^{What did I do?} 00:54, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete — Per rationale by nom, JayJay & KidAd. Celestina007 (talk) 01:17, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. The person doesn't seem to be notable. Headlines refer to him simply as "Alabama man." Bartholomite (talk) 02:07, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• delete per
  WP:NOTNEWS. Possibly when the dust settles he might be covered in the article on the riot, but it's too soon to make an article on him, Mangoe (talk) 03:08, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• delete definitely a
  wp:SUSPECT case here. No significant coverage beyond sources outing the subject of a photograph. If this dramatically changes I'd be open to revisit this topic, but right now, it's just problematic. BrxBrx(talk)^{(please reply with {{SUBST:re|BrxBrx}})} 03:21, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete per nom and above rationale. B.Rossow · talk 03:23, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to
  talk | contribs) 03:57, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete | See
  WP:BLP1E. Thrakkx (talk) 04:01, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete per nom. Damien Linnane (talk) 04:59, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete not every single person connected to the failed coup d'etat is GNG notable. cookie monster (2020) 755 06:28, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect Only notable for
  talk) 09:10, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete per nom and everyone else. Love of Corey (talk) 09:23, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom and aforementioned justifications. Jacenty359 (talk) 12:23, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Not notable. Everything that needs to be said should be on the page about the event. --Doric Loon (talk) 12:24, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete per both
  2021 storming of the United States Capitol. warmly, ezlev. talk 18:11, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete and redirect, per BLP1E. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 20:06, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• WP:SNOW Delete. Lets put this one to rest as we have a clear consensus. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 20:31, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Speedy or snow delete: CRIME, BLP1E and GNG are all individually sufficient reasons to delete this. — Bilorv (talk) 22:46, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.