Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loso's Way 2: Rise to Power
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. The Bushranger One ping only 16:57, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Loso's Way 2: Rise to Power
- Loso's Way 2: Rise to Power (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There has been no sourced content added since 2011. There is not enough information released (or current information) to keep this article alive. Delete (or redirect to
]- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:04, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. With no confirmed tracklisting or release date, I agree with nom that this upcoming album doesn't warrant an individual article at this time. That said, could the brief, reliably-sourced paragraph be merged into the "2010-present" section of the main Fabolous article? Gongshow Talk 08:12, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relistedto generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 14:13, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment, this was certainly a case of stoned 12:50, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relistedto generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 02:36, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relistedto generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:51, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Incubate - I agree that doesn't seem to meet ]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.