Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loubna Berrada

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sufficient consensus. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:57, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Loubna Berrada

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm listing this per

WP:BLP1E). SmartSE (talk) 20:39, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:54, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:54, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:54, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as nothing actually suggesting any applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 05:54, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - Certainly needs to be reworked. They are a Dutch politician, so improving the article could answer notability questions. That said, it still doesn't address everything. DaltonCastle (talk) 22:28, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
As a politician she fails
talk) 13:00, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 21:57, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

While being the leader of an organization can get a person into Wikipedia if the article is sourced and substanced solidly enough to pass
WP:BLP about her trumps her own expressed concerns about the article's accuracy — so I'm simply not seeing why she needs a standalone article as a separate topic from the organization. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 23:59, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.