Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lovepantii (series)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

Lovepantii (series)

Lovepantii (series) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article was moved out of draft by recent editor, so only option is AFD. Sources are main pre-publicity puff pieces, one source from post release but no real information used from that source. Article needs something to show notability, but the existing sources and article text don't have that. A decent production section, some reviews from after the show began - something. As it is now, this should be in draft but we can't move it back there. Ravensfire (talk) 16:11, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Ravensfire (talk) 16:11, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Ravensfire (talk) 16:11, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete garbage through and through. Sock spam with no reliable sources, and no indication that it's a notable series. CUPIDICAE💕 16:28, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Article has been moved to Lovepantii page title. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:30, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Thank you for noting that. For more drama, see the logs at Lovepanti which was finally protected due to Leofrancis355 repeatedly moving a junk article with multiple declines out of draft space. Some sources use a single 'i' at the end, others use two 'ii' at the end. I'm pretty sure the current creator is the latest sock of Leo, need to get that SPI up. Ugh, so much fun... Ravensfire (talk) 15:47, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I could see only one reliable source for this article. Not notable. Pabsoluterince (talk) 06:09, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.