Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luana D'Orazio

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 23:52, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Luana D'Orazio

Luana D'Orazio (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Although tragic, not really notable enough for Wikipedia. Could perhaps have a sentence or two on COVID-19 pandemic in Italy. SɱαɾƚყPαɳƚʂ22 (Ⓣⓐⓛⓚ) 19:49, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:00, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:00, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:00, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This article had very strong media coverage and well constructed. It had a strong impact on Italian public opinion for the young victim, a debut actress and model, a worker and a mother in an Italy heavily affected by the COVID-19 pandemic that tries to restart its artisan companies. Peter39c (talk) 20:10, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Fails
  ^{• whaddya want? •} 21:33, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete Death, while tragic, is not enough for an article on Wikipedia. One uncredited role is not significant coverage. Donaldd23 (talk) 21:47, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No personal evidence Telex80 (talk) 06:07, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• I´m sorry but also vote for Delete, as she had just one film made.--Bodhi-Baum (talk) 08:17, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. This poor girl only made the headlines because of the manner of her death, and has exactly zero notability. • Huferpad talk 10:06, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per previous votes - DrachenFyre (talk) 14:26, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • I mean they're not "votes" but I get your message. Best wishes – SɱαɾƚყPαɳƚʂ22 (Ⓣⓐⓛⓚ) 17:36, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I agree with everything that has been said so far. Despite the extremely tragic death, the page doesn't satisfy the encyclopedicity criteria. AleCapHollywood (talk) 21:12, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Yep, I'm afraid it's an open and shut case. Deb (talk) 19:10, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete This is not a notable person. The circumstances surrounding her death may be controversial, but that does not justify an article about the person, who had a minor part in one movie. Ref ^(chew)(do) 09:28, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.