Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucidiologist

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete.

Fram (talk) 08:16, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

Lucidiologist

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Move to wikitionary. Makecat _Talk 07:34, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deleted as a hoax, Wiktionary should not be used for self-invented neologisms.

Fram (talk) 08:15, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.