Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucky Three

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Elliott Smith. There is a clear consensus that a separate articles isn't warranted, but no consensus to remove the history of the page from public view. (non-admin closure) Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:02, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lucky Three

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable film, as evident by its being tagged for notability for 10 months. No references, fails

talk to me 12:19, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the

talk to me 12:20, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the

talk to me 12:20, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

I'd suggest deleting this article and leaving a note on Talk:Elliott Smith discography to merge the useful information into the Filmography section of that page. - Phorque (talk) 12:33, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:42, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:42, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redirect and partial merge of whatever is sourcable to the
policy. Thanks, Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 05:14, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:21, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:34, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Partial merge as above; it doesn't seem to be independently notable as far as a Google search shows (a short doc like this is unlikely to get much in the way of reviews) and it's not won awards etc that might bring notability. But certainly sourced info should be included as part of coverage of Elliott Smith. --Colapeninsula (talk) 13:19, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.