Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ludovic Le Moan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 03:24, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ludovic Le Moan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Part of a promotional campaign for the company and its executives; the WP part of their extensive promotion was carried out buy one of our more prolific undeclared paid editors , before they were caught at it and blocked.

There's nothing here that is notable independent of the company (the article on the company is equaally duplicative and promotional--see adjacent AfD.This one is just duplication. The refs. are press releases, or articles about the company that quote him. We need a rule that when we catch people doing this sort of editing , their "contributions" are removed retrospectively. Most will be removed anyway for promotionalism and lack of notability , but it would greatly simplify matters to go straight to the cause of hte problem. DGG ( talk ) 04:15, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete Agree with above reasoning. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 06:36, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:00, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:00, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- part of an apparent walled garden around Sigfox. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:55, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - nom has it exactly right. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 22:55, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.