Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lynn Peterson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep,

List of Mayors of Cleveland, Ohio has a whole bunch of bluelinks. --- Deville (Talk) 03:15, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

Lynn Peterson

Makes only one claim of notability, being mayor of a reasonable-sized town, but that falls below the level of office which is considered inherently notable per

the notability guideline. Absent any independent claim to notability, this is just one of the myriad local politicians for whom there will never be sufficient interest to ensure ongoing coverage in reliable sources. Just zis Guy you know? 14:15, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

Keep Central city to Northern Ontario, the current Mayor should have a page. Should be expanded. Clausewitz01
Keep Mayor of an important town is an encyclopaedic topic. Being a stub is not a criterion for deletion, but for expansion. WilyD 15:42, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Lynn Peterson already has 29 GNews hits [1], that's enough for an article. WilyD 15:42, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per
WP:BIO. The mayor of a city is a major local political figure. -- Whpq 17:53, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply
]

Actually,

WP:BIO sets the bar at "statewide office", not city-wide. wikipediatrix 01:10, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

# Major local political figures who receive (or received) significant press coverage No, it basically demands mayors of highly important cities be kept. WilyD 03:27, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say that due to the position of mayor, almost all mayors would get some significant local coverage. -- Whpq 03:29, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That may not be the case for the mayor of

Iron Bridge, Ontario WilyD 03:36, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete per nom. wikipediatrix 01:10, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Unlike the AFD above, she actually won the election. Good enough for me. Kirjtc2 02:34, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Municipal politicians are not notable per
WP:BIO. TB is not even a big municipality: "According to the 2001 census, there were 109,016 people residing in Thunder Bay", 0.33% of the Canadian population. Ohconfucius 03:55, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply
]

Comment Regardless of population, Thunder Bay is the hub of activity for that region of Northern Ontario which is not as densely populated. -- Whpq 11:13, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please read a little farther into the Thunder Bay article before make verifiably false statements. WilyD 11:39, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing out my very poorly worded comment. I didn't mean to say that Thunder Bay as sparsely populated. I meant to compare the population density of Norethern Ontaio, to Southern Ontario. The northern part of the provine is more sparsely populated than the southern part, and Thunder Bay represents a major population and activity centre for a large region. Using population unqualified as User:Ohconfucius did doesn't properly represent the importance of the city. Once again, thatnks for pointing it out so I can properly express myself. -- Whpq 12:02, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom; unoriginal, but short and to the point. Angus McLellan (Talk) 21:18, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.