Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MEETS (cable system)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:18, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
MEETS (cable system)
- MEETS (cable system) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is a stub about a yet-to-be built telecommunication cable. The consortium that wants to build it was formed in September of this year.
Fails
WP:FUTURE: Wikipedia is not a collection of product announcements and rumors. While Wikipedia includes up-to-date knowledge about newly revealed products, short articles that consist only of product announcement information are not appropriate. Until such time that more encyclopedic knowledge about the product can be verified, product announcements should be merged to a larger topic (such as an article about the creator(s), a series of products, or a previous product) if applicable. Speculation and rumor, even from reliable sources, are not appropriate encyclopedic content. Until such time that more encyclopedic knowledge about the product can be verified, product announcements should be merged to a larger topic (such as an article about the creator(s), a series of products, or a previous product) if applicable. Speculation and rumor, even from reliable sources, are not appropriate encyclopedic content. Toddst1 (talk) 13:29, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:23, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:23, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:24, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
- Relistedto generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton | Talk 03:16, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete - reliable. ~KvnG 00:02, 1 December 2013 (UTC)]
- Relistedto generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 00:50, 5 December 2013 (UTC)]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.