Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/METRO CITY

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 00:11, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

METRO CITY

Prodded as a non-notable micronation. Deprodded on the grounds that it is fictional. Although the lead sentence does say so, the rest of the article is written as if it were in fact factual in real life. The article also fails to state in which work of fiction this micronation was introduced and/or exists. Also, no sources. Delete. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 02:34, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fictional--the story? What story? Drmies (talk) 02:49, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete If it's fictional, it's not supposed to be written in an in-universe style is it?Camera123456 (talk) 02:59, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete
Townlake (talk) 03:02, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply
]
- Actually, based on these diffs [1] [2], this can probably be safely speedied.
  Townlake (talk) 03:29, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Delete Nonsense. Ecphora (talk) 03:21, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non notable fiction. Dude 2006 (talk) 03:35, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I believe the technical term for this is "crap". JuJube (talk) 03:56, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Hmm, maybe a redirect to Final Fight would work, too? JuJube (talk) 04:22, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non notable fiction & Nonsense at all. Daniel5127 ^(talk) 04:10, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. There is not even a work of fiction to source this article to. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:29, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is non-notable and clearly the product of someone's imagination. I'd suggest a redirect to either Final Fight or
chatter) 09:38, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Comment I've created Metro City as a dab page per the suggestions above. We don't need to retain the miscapitalized version. - Mgm|^(talk) 12:45, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete: as an obvious hoax[-on-wikipedia, not hoax-on-real-world =? vandalism or =? patent nonsense] (as there's no fictional work that it's claimed to be from). Hrafn^Talk_Stalk^(P) 16:35, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- If this is speedied as a hoax it'll be open to challenge, since hoaxes are specifically excluded from the speedy criteria. It is, however, clearly part of a vandalism campaign.
  Townlake (talk) 17:25, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Delete per all above. ArcAngel (talk) 17:49, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per others. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 21:26, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per
WP:V as I was unable to verify this article's content, which seems like something someone just made up? Best, --A Nobody^{My talk} 21:42, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete I have no idea what story this editor is talking about.
talk) 21:49, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete per
WP:NFT. Gsearch for any of the character names mentioned come up empty; this piece of fiction seems to only exist on Wikipedia.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:02, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.