Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MOPS International
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was withdrawn. Nom stated they would withdraw "tomorrow", around 20 hours ago; feel free to reopen if this was a bit early. (non-admin closure) Ansh666 20:38, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
MOPS International
- MOPS International (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article lacks sources other than to organization website. No secondary sources indicate notability. Google search reveals websites for local branches of MOPS, but not much more. Fails
WP:CLUB as multiple, third party sources do not indicate importance. – S. Rich (talk) 22:03, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:49, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:50, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
- Comment by OP – a secondary source has been added to the article. Basically it is the repeat of a press announcement by MOPS about changes in management. Does not, IMO, provide indication of notability. – S. Rich (talk) 00:13, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
- Keep I've never heard of MOPS before, but I did find a number of sources in my HighBeam search of which I added several sources. There are more I could add. The first source I added above stated that the article was put together by the staff of the magazine (at the bottom of the article). I am One of Many (talk) 00:26, 2 September 2014 (UTC)]
- Comment by OP – I see the additional sources. With your efforts in mind and appreciated, I shall withdraw this nomination. Not at the moment though. I'm engaged on another gnomish project at present. Probably tomorrow. – S. Rich (talk) 00:56, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.