Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MX Machine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 12:13, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MX Machine

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While I agree with my colleague (courtesy @Kvng:) that a 1985 subject requires extra effort, the 2007 return should have generated some coverage and I can't identify anything that meets NMUSIC nor a viable AtD. Star Mississippi 16:15, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and California. Star Mississippi 16:15, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, zero results in Worldradiohistory.com which archives music magazines from this era. No results on Newspapers.com. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 16:23, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per TenPoundHammer ~Kvng (talk) 17:39, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Nothing on Newspapers, Wayback, Google, Proquest, or EBSCO. Insufficient sourcing to demonstrate significant coverage in reliable, independent sources means this ought to be deleted for not meeting GNG and no alternative criteria for keep per NMUSIC.
talk) 06:53, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.