Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Macula (planetary geology)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 03:56, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Macula (planetary geology)

This one-line dictionary definition survived a previous prod (June 07) on the grounds that it had the potential for expansion, however I really don't see that being the case, and in over a year there hasn't been any such expansion. Equazcion •✗/C • 21:52, 8 Feb 2009 (UTC)

Soft redirect to wiktionary. I'll go ahead and do that now.--S Marshall ^Talk/_Cont 22:22, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - sorry; but I think that bold redirecting should await the result of the AfD.
talk) 02:10, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete This is just a dictionary definition (and one already in Wiktionary, at that) already provided in the few WP pages that link to it. It doesn't appear that there's anything additional to be said here, although I'm willing to be proved wrong, if anyone has further info they can add. Anaxial (talk) 22:37, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into
talk) 02:16, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Merge and redirect - I do think that this has potential for expansion as our knowledge of planetary geology improves, so keeping the page as a redirect would serve a purpose. That said, as it stands the suggested merge seems the best option.— Preceding unsigned comment added by DuncanHill (talk • contribs) 08:07, 9 February 2009
Merge as above. Axl ¤ [Talk] 16:35, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep- A five minute search turned up the following sources: [1], [2], [3], [4], which are enough to write a small but respectable stub, and I'm sure there's more sources to be found. I will expand the article later, when I have time. Reyk _YO! 20:59, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- More sources: [5], [6] Reyk _YO! 21:12, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect as TerriersFan.
talk) 21:36, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.