Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madeline Duggan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. (ESkog)^(Talk) 21:39, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Madeline Duggan

• Delete - she really does not appear to be very notable Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! ^(Whisper...) 12:46, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, per
  WP:BIO. [1]. PJM 13:17, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete, fails
  e Ong 15:21, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep
  WP:BIO says "A large fan base, fan listing or "cult" following", which I'm sure EastEnders has... Trampikey 16:23, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete per nom. That EastEnders has such a fan base is apparent. That this particular unknown actress, whose entire film career is a part in a nine minute short film, does not is equally apparent. She has fewer than 30 unique hits on Google UK, the lead ones of which are her IMDB entry and this article, and the third one of which is from a UK fan site vainly asking if there's any biographical information available. The EastEnders official website doesn't even list her in the cast yet, for pity's sake.
  RGTraynor 17:11, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep. She's playing a character on EastEnders, that's pretty notable. --badlydrawnjeff talk 20:08, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per badlydrawnjeff. Sweetie Petie 20:14, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• keep because she is going to be in eastenders soon. Jamie 18:42, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - there is verifiable information that she will regulalry appear on one of Britan's most watched TV shows. Early in her career for many accolades or google hits, but so long as this has some references, it's doing no harm. I've seen articles claiming notability for performing in a community centre: prime time BBC One is not bad. The JPS^{talk to me} 18:35, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.