Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mahmoode modaberi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Favonian (talk) 20:13, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mahmoode modaberi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Effectively unsourced BLP. No evidence of notability. The Banner talk 09:45, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I recommend a A7 speedy delete
Sign my Guestbook 09:48, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

keep. Doctor Mahmoud Modaberi martyr Bahonar kerman University professor and has published numerous articles and the book, therefore, is a prominent academic. Thanks Iranmanesh53 (talk) 12:02, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Could you please give sourced evidence of that? The Banner talk 12:09, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails
WP:PROF in that, while he is a university professor, he does not appear to be a particularly notable professor. Surely, if kept, the machine translation needs major cleanup. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:30, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete. No sourced evidence of notability sufficient to pass
WP:PROF. --Kinu ^t/_c 18:01, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:33, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:33, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Does not appear to meet any of the
WP:PROF criteria. -- 101.117.58.208 (talk) 11:17, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Comment This article was written in apparent
Object–subject–verb English. I've done what I could to tidy it up. but it still needs work.--Auric talk 22:21, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Speedy delete, G5. User's contributions suggest pretty blatant socking; see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kamran1370/Archive. Hairhorn (talk) 12:47, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
~~keep~~.The owner of the well-known academic article and the owner of several articles and books. Many thanks Iranmanesh53 (talk) 16:40, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't !vote more than once. --Kinu ^t/_c 16:48, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.