Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Majeed Pejajj

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 11:31, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Majeed Pejajj

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced biographical article. No independent evidence that this person existed. Slashme (talk) 20:15, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: No book sources that pre-date the Wikipedia article. --Slashme (talk) 20:18, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:32, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:32, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:32, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The content of this article is unverifiable. It could be useful to know the Arabic (?) transcription of his name, if it exists. --
Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 14:45, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

Weak Keep edit history does show books listed as sources- later removed. Can we verify whether or not these books contain relevant information? Porphyro (talk) 10:33, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Could you provide a
Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 13:10, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Majeed_Pejajj&diff=156951943&oldid=156876330 the link is to a British library book reference, now dead presumably as a result of a website change Porphyro (talk) 13:45, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I went to the JSTOR version of the book and searched for "majeed" and then for "pejajj" and came up empty both times. --Slashme (talk) 21:21, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CharlieEchoTango (contact) 09:15, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DELETE - Not notable. -- Bharathiya (talk) 09:40, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Unable to locate any sources to verify the information present in the article. I also tried searching using the alternate name mentioned in the article's talk page, and was likewise unable to find anything reliable, just a mention of the name and his death in a question and answer type site. Even if this individual did exist, there's still nothing to show that he was notable. Rorshacma (talk) 19:04, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If this is really a hoax, it's the longest standing hoax on wikipedia I have ever seen Porphyro (talk) 11:06, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.