Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Make Way for Willie Nelson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn by nominator. Bearcat (talk) 18:15, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Make Way for Willie Nelson

Withdraw:Foolishness? Laughable? As I said, I missed the Dropbox when looking over this thing alright? If I'd seen that I'd have whacked 'random article' and not looked back. Let's drop this AfD in the Archives before I drop all of you (as in leave.) MM (Report findings) ^{(Past espionage)} 06:20, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Quite possibly good for CSD A7 if CD's fell under it. I'm not seeing anything that labels the CD as 'notable' under our guidelines when I do a Google search either. MM (Report findings) ^{(Past espionage)} 10:02, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the

czar · · 10:26, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Keep - The album is from a notable musician (Willie Nelson), released on a major record label (RCA), and hit #9 in the US Country music charts in 1967. Perhaps it may be hard to dig up sources on albums from the 60's, but it would certainly be out there as a release of this caliber. If the potential is there, then we don't delete. Sergecross73 msg me 15:07, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As a part of Nelson's discography, and one of his few top ten albums from his run with RCA, it is relevant to keep the article. I wrote basic information when I created it, but more sources and probably more content can be added (as the comment above noted, the available, since the record was released during the 1960s). I've been working on Nelson related articles for the past years, but as you can notice,
his discography, is composed by way too many records to take care of everything on a short time. By now, I just added a reference to the #9 on Hot Country albums.--GDuwenTell me! 17:16, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep and speedy close. Aside from the deplorable foolishness of punching holes in the discographies of major artists, it's very clear that the nominator didn't perform a basic Google Books search; the very first hit, a Nelson bio, clearly demonstrates notability. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 02:05, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if this one's an NPA. I grant you guys I missed the Dropbox when XFDing it but check your papers before you file them if you will, first hit here is Amazon... MM (Report findings) ^{(Past espionage)} 06:20, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That "check your papers" link is plainly not a GBooks search. Just click the "books" link in the header. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 11:01, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jesus H pardon my actions Amigo, I completely missed that it said Basic Google Books search, I've gotta learn to read the whole thing before speaking my mind. Trust me, it's an off-wiki problem of mine as well. Sorry :/ MM (Report findings) ^{(Past espionage)} 15:39, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Early work of a music legend that was top 10 upon its release? I don't usually want to call a nomination laughable, but this is definitely that.
chatter) 03:45, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Thanks... Thanks a lot... MM (Report findings) ^{(Past espionage)} 06:20, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.