Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malik Rosier
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Eddie891 Talk Work 20:10, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Malik Rosier
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Malik Rosier (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails
]- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:29, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:29, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete does not meet our inclusion criteria for gridiron football players.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:41, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. Passes ]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:46, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per Cbl62.-- Yankees10 00:05, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. Meets ]
- Keep - Cbl62's sourcing easily indicates a GNG pass. Hog Farm Talk 17:17, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep clearly passes WP:GNG. Sources need to be added to the article, but that is an editing issue and not a deletion issue.--Paul McDonald (talk) 17:28, 27 January 2021 (UTC)]
- Keep per talk) 05:07, 28 January 2021 (UTC)]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.