Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mamadú Iaia Djaló

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Number 57 has shown that the subject passes

WP:NPOLITICIAN. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 06:32, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Mamadú Iaia Djaló

Mamadú Iaia Djaló (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unelected politician who received a small fraction of the popular vote. Never held office. Delete per

WP:POLITICIAN. A loose necktie (talk) 13:18, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:29, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:54, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 16:00, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Withdrawn): While this person does lead a political party, the party is a minor one, having only gained 1 seat in a 102 seat assembly. Further, it wasn't him who held that seat, thus failing
    WP:SIGCOV. We're not seeing that here. If such sources are found, I'm willing to reconsider but right now I'm not seeing it. --Hammersoft (talk) 03:56, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Speedy keep He was Minister of Commerce and Industry in the most recent government ([1]) and previously served as Minister of Justice ([2]) so clearly passes
    WP:NPOLITICIAN. Also several stories about him that would help pass GNG ([3][4]) Pinging Hammersoft for reconsideration. Number 57 13:05, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.