Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ManagerZone (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Power Challenge. czar 06:07, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ManagerZone

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

WP:GNG. Topic lacks significant coverage from reliable secondary sources. Current references are entirely first-party sources. The1337gamer (talk) 20:11, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Izno (talk) 21:01, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There are a handful of (probably passing) references/unreliable sources in Google Scholar which should be assessed. --Izno (talk) 21:08, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Since this is exactly the same article (with possibly worse sources) that was closed as redirect last time, I don't see any problem with simply doing that again. Black Kite (talk) 12:43, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest, I didn't bother to check the article history and realise it was previously deleted via AfD. Had I done that, then I would have just redirected and not nominated again but oh well. --The1337gamer (talk) 16:54, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No worries—the content isn't the same and the article history wasn't public so there's no way you would have known czar 06:06, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.