Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manayunk Special Services District of Philadelphia

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to Manayunk, Philadelphia as neither of the delete !votes appear to actually contest a merge (not sure how else it should be a part of the proposed target) Star Mississippi 22:08, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Manayunk Special Services District of Philadelphia

Manayunk Special Services District of Philadelphia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination
)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely fails

WP:ORGCRIT. Cannot find any examples of significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. AusLondonder (talk) 18:37, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

  • Merge There is a quarter century old complaint against it, [1] and a year old financial report, [2] which I think is enough to earn it a sentence in the neighborhood article though not an article of its own. Jim.henderson (talk) 00:36, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • If nobody else comments today or tomorrow, I intend to drop the flag, reflag for merge in the respective article Talk Pages and, if still answered with silence, execute the merger next week. Jim.henderson (talk) 15:14, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 23:24, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete : absurd stub article. This Philly bureaucracy should be a part of the Manayunk, Philadelphia article in an appropriate section but not a merge or redirect. Nirva20 (talk) 00:07, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete It doesn't need an article for this. Currently fails
    WP:SIGCOV. scope_creepTalk 13:55, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.