Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manpareka Kehi Kavita

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 18:31, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Manpareka Kehi Kavita

Manpareka Kehi Kavita (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable work by Suman Pokhrel. A few users seem to have created articles about everything he's done, linked together by Template:Suman Pokhrel. The author is notable but most, if not all, of his works don't deserve a stand-alone article. Usedtobecool TALK  10:21, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Usedtobecool TALK  10:21, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. Usedtobecool TALK  10:21, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. Usedtobecool TALK  10:21, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 12:06, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Going on your nom statement, this is worse because it's not even a book he's himself written, but rather an anthology he collated from others. However, if it were still notable we'd still have an article on it. I don't read any South Asian language, unfortunately, so using Google Translate it appears that all the sources in the article are either press releases or the book (or a translation) itself, none of which establish notability. There aren't really any other good sources found with a GSearch. – John M Wolfson (talkcontribs) 16:54, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.