Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manuel de la Rocha Vázquez

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 01:43, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Manuel de la Rocha Vázquez

Manuel de la Rocha Vázquez (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

promotional bio of minor politician--no elected offices or cabinet rank. The refs seem promotional of mere notices DGG ( talk ) 13:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 13:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 13:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
All content is backed up by several reliable third-party sources, intellectually independent of each other: La Información,
WP:NPOL, but then again, the article complies to WP:BASIC. Complying to WP:BASIC and not complying to WP:NPOL seems to be rather routine in Wikipedia at least for articles of US policy wonks (either in "national party committees" or "cabinet offices"). Care to inform why is it "promotional"?--Asqueladd (talk) 14:14, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
The rule is not that people are exempted from
WP:GNG-based exemption from having to hold an NPOL-passing role. Bearcat (talk) 17:41, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
Logs: 2020-11 ✍️ create
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 02:29, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 01:24, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Third times the charm.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 03:48, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - I originally marked this article as reviewed, but that was due to misunderstanding his current role in the government, thinking that the department of economic affairs was a cabinet-level position. It isn't, so therefore he doesn't meet
    WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 13:51, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Delete Fails
    WP:GNG Kolma8 (talk) 15:34, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.