Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marc St. Jean

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 19:02, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Marc St. Jean

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While the article has refs the subject fails

WP:Hockey as the highest league he played in was the ECHL which does not grant notability unless preeminent honours are achieved. Tay87 (talk) 11:02, 21 April 2019 (UTC) Tay87 (talk) 11:02, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:15, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:15, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:15, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the

list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:15, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete another in a long line of articles on non-notable hockey players.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:07, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, agree with above completely. Putting puck to ice in a low-level league isn’t enough. Hyperbolick (talk) 21:13, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
delete Agree with previous comments. Fails both
WP:NHOCKEY and the GNG.Sandals1 (talk) 18:24, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete - Does not meet notability criteria as per
WP:NHOCKEY. Playing with a puck does not necessarily make you notable. Spyder212 (talk) 20:44, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.