Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marco Polo Adriano-Garcia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 22:22, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Marco Polo Adriano-Garcia

Marco Polo Adriano-Garcia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

ALSO DELETE REDIRECT: Marco Polo Garcia. Quis separabit? 13:57, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: as non-notable actor and even less notable alleged politician. Quis separabit? 12:25, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:40, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:40, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Lucita Soriano as my searches found nothing outstandingly good to suggest improvement. SwisterTwister talk 07:40, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Passes
  WP:NACTOR, significant roles in multiple significant films, including a best supporting actor award from the Film Academy of the Philippines. 1.--RioHondo (talk) 02:24, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Impressive reply, @RioHondo. Quis separabit? 00:46, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Notable.--
  WP:AFD, to wit: "Remember that while AfD may look like a voting process, it does not operate like one. Justification and evidence for a response carries far more weight than the response itself.") Quis separabit? 00:46, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. This person doesn't exactly pass
  WP:NACTOR. Is winning an award from the Philippine film academy supposed to satisfy "Has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment"? If we were to create a Wikipedia page for everyone who won an "award", we would have countless stubs about non-notable people. Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 13:05, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]
  • I suggest reading Film Academy of the Philippines if you haven't done so. Believe it or not, there is a thing called local or national notability, or a local or national Oscars.--RioHondo (talk) 13:34, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • The way that article looks right now, the FAP doesn't even appear to be notable by itself. You know, just because someone gives someone else an award they don't directly become notable. Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 13:51, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, nothing on searches showed they meet either
  WP:NACTOR. The FAP article is wholly unsourced with RS. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:59, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]
  • WP:ARTN. Added ref to FAP article.--RioHondo (talk) 00:01, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply
    ]
    • A link to a government site that shows FAP being endorsed by a former dictator president. How does this actually establish the organization's notability? or credibility? Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 12:45, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.