Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marcus Louis (2nd nomination)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 00:32, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Marcus Louis

Marcus Louis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page was created soon after the article was deleted via AfD. There's still nothing to support claims of notability. The sources consist solely of fight results and announcements. He's not even competing in the WWE yet, just in its minor league.Mdtemp (talk) 19:03, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 20:22, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete This article was recreated shortly after deletion with the Db-repost declined on questionable grounds (point was raised by Papaursa). The article did have more references than the original but as the nominator they are not of high quality and he performs in the minor league.Peter Rehse (talk) 20:50, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti Talk 15:36, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. -- Ascii002 (talk · contribs · guestbook) 09:12, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- Ascii002 (talk · contribs · guestbook) 09:13, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:58, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.