Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Margaret Sarfo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. After being relisted once and garnering a handful of comments, the clear consensus is that she is notable.

(non-admin closure) Dusti ^{*Let's talk!*} 08:14, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Margaret Sarfo

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Two obituaries (from her employer) and a passing mention ("The rest are...");

WP:BEFORE run on both names, "Margaret Sarfo" and "Peggy Oppong", nothing but social media, sales sites & her employer's obituary - not notable. Cabayi (talk) 19:37, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 19:38, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 19:38, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:17, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, the sources cited are RS and many of them discussed the subject in detail. The few that are passing mentions together with the other sources provide collaborative prove that the subject is notable.Tamsier (talk) 15:58, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, I am a user from Ghana and the subject in question is quite notable, just like the user above mentioned the publication discusses in detail the person in question and all the supporting sources confirm her notability. --Flixtey (talk) 16:06, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This paper is a major national new source in Ghana https://www.graphic.com.gh This makes here notablae at a national scale and thus suitable for Wikipedia. IMO Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 12:20, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:33, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep a woman editor of a major African newspaper? Notable. Sources for modern day people in Africa can be hard to find, as a lot of the press isn't online and accessible in Europe and the U.S. yet. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 18:33, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.