Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marina Quays

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to

(non-admin closure) ——SN54129 16:01, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Marina Quays

Marina Quays (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats
)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I cannot find any reliable secondary sources for this topic, nor have there been any sources on the page since 2015. Has previously been rejected for speedy deletion but no major improvements to the page seem to have taken place since. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 15:28, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:54, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:19, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:19, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's
list of content for rescue consideration. Lightburst (talk) 15:28, 9 November 2019 (UTC) [reply
]
1) Architect's website, apparently - I was directed to a browser-hijack webpage, so cannot confirm, but that's the reason why I ended up doing the full source review
2) Does not mention Marina Quays
3) I didn't see Marina Quays mentioned, but it's a scroll-thru-the-photos style article which I think we typically significantly downweight or exclude for notability purposes?
4) One mention of "Marina Quays," but it's not clear it's discussing the development
5) This is a real estate website
6) The "Sales and Leasing expert" mentioned the development's name and nothing
7&11) Emporis is a building database, not used for notability
8) Appears to be the official website of the Dubai Marina, Primary
9) Skyscraper Center is a building database
10) Flatreviews.com is an apartments aggregator
  • I"m happy the article is improved, but it's still not yet notable, so I think an upmerge is the best way to go. SportingFlyer T·C 13:14, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: These are exactly the kind of references one could expect to find unless we are talking about an internationally known building like the Empire State building. Thanks for the hard work Djflem! NBUILD this area and Marina Quays has social, economic importance Additionally the architecture feature of the cantilevered building, extending 20m over the Dubai Marina waterway is notable. A merge is not a terrible idea, my only concern is that the Dubai Marina (target for merge) will likely be a bit long soon. Many of the notable topic headings have not been fleshed out or linked as of yet. Construction continues. Lightburst (talk) 15:47, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The info in this article is easily stated in one paragraph which would not overburden target in any way.Djflem (talk) 16:48, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge Sources are pretty routine real estate content that don't appear to establish notability as any more than generic tall(ish) buildings people live in. They're luxury but can be covered in the main article with their lookalike neighbors. Reywas92Talk 20:04, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge The entire article could easily merge over to Dubai_Marina#Marina_Quays. Dream Focus 22:10, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Still Delete (or Merge)
    WP:GNG. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 00:05, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Merge to Dubai Marina. There's not enough independent sources to shows why it should be notable singly. صدیق صبري (talk) 09:27, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment looks like we are headed for a merge and I will concur. Perhaps someone can put the merge in motion before a full delete. Lightburst (talk) 14:27, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Please familiarize with AfD process. A merge would take place after this discussion is closed.Djflem (talk) 22:19, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.